Observation of the magnetospheric "sash" and its implications relative to solar-wind/magnetospheric coupling: A multisatellite event analysis

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 6097-6122

  Maynard, N C ^a   Savin, S ^b   Erickson, G M ^c   Kawano, H ^d   Nemecek Z ^e   Peterson, W K ^f   Safranokova J ^e   Sandahl, I ^g   Scudder, J D ^h   Siscoe, G L ^c   Sonnerup, B U O ⁱ   Weimer, D R ^a   White, W W ^a   Wilson, G R ^a  

^a MISSION RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Department of Satellite Monitoring Technologies   (Russian Federation)

^c Boston University   (United States)

^d KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^f LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

^g SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF SPACE PHYSICS   (Sweden)

^h UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

ⁱ DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000507555     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Atkinson, G., Magnetospheric flows and substorms, in Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Interactions, edited by K. Folke- stad, p. 203, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1972.
2. Borovsky, J. E., R. C. Elphic, H. O. Funsten, and M. F. Thomsen, The Earth's plasma sheet as a laboratory for flow turbulence in high β MHD, J. Plasma Phys., 57, 1, 1997.
3. Burke, W. J., E. M. Basinska, N. C. Maynard, W. B. Hanson, J. A. Slavin, and J. D. Winningham, Polar cap potentials during periods of positive By and northward IMF, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 56, 209, 1994.
4. Cowley, S. W. H., A qualitative study of the reconnection between the Earth's magnetic field and an interplanetary field of arbitrary orientation, Radio Sci., 8, 903, 1973.
5. Crooker, N. U., Dayside merging and cusp geometry, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 951, 1979.
6. Crooker, N. U., Reverse convection, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19,363, 1992.
7. Crooker, N. U., J. G. Lyon, and J. A. Fedder, MHD model merging with IMF By: Lobe cells, sunward polar cap convection, and overdraped lobes, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 9143, 1998.
8. Fujimoto, M., T. Terasawa, and T. Mukai, The low-latitude boundary layer in the tail flanks, in New Perspectives on the Earth's Magnetotail, Geophys. Monogr. Ser. vol.105, edited by A. Nishida, D. N. Baker, and S. W. H. Cowley, p. 33, AGU, Washington, D. C, 1998.
9. Haerendel, G., Microscopic plasma processes related to reconnection, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 40, 343, 1978.
10. Hardy, D. A., K. L. Schmidt, M. S. Gussenhoven, F. J. Marshall, H. C. Yeh, T. L. Shumaker, A. Huber, and J. Pan- tazis, Precipitating electron and ion detectors (SSJ/4) for the block 5D flights 4-10 DMSP satellites: Calibration and data presentation, Tech. Rep. AFGL-TR-84-0317, Air Force Geophys. Lab., Hanscom Air Force Base, Mass., 1984.
11. Harvey, P., et al., The electric field instrument on Polar, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 583, 1995.
12. Heppner, J. P., and N. C. Maynard, Empirical high-latitude electric field models, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 4467, 1987.
13. Heppner, J. P., M. Sugiura, T. L. Skillman, B. G. Ledley, and M. Campbell, OGO-A magnetic field observations, J. Geophys. Res.,72, 5417, 1967.
14. Hesse, M., and K. Schindler, A theoretical foundation of general magnetic reconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 5559, 1988.
15. Kawano, H., and T. Higuchi, The bootstrap method in space physics: Error estimation for minimum variance analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett, 22, 307, 1995.
16. Kaymaz, Z., and G. Siscoe, The geometry of the open tail cross section, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,829, 1998.
17. Kaymaz, Z., G. Siscoe, J. G. Luhmann, J. A. Fedder, and J. G. Lyon, Interplanetary magnetic field control of magnetotail field: IMP 8 data and MHD model compared, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 17,163, 1995.
18. Khrabrov, A. V., and B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, Error estimates for minimum variance analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6641, 1998.
19. Klimov, S., et al., ASPI experiment: Measurements of fields and waves onboard Interball-l spacecraft, Ann. Geophys., 15, 514, 1997.
20. Kokubun, S., T. Yamamoto, M. H. Acuńa, K. Hayashi, K. Shiokawa, and H. Kawano, The Geotail magnetic field experiment, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 7, 1994.
21. La Belle-Hamer, A. L., A. Otto, and L. C. Lee, Magnetic reconnection in the presence of sheared flow and density asymmetry: Applications to the Earth's magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11,875, 1995.
22. Lepping, R. P., et al., The Wind magnetic field investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207, 1995.
23. Lotko, W., B. U. O. Sonnerup, and R. L. Lysak, Nonsteady boundary layer flow including ionospheric drag and parallel electric fields, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 8635, 1987.
24. Luhmann, J. G., R. J. Walker, C. T. Russell, N. U. Crooker, J. R. Spreiter, and S. Stahara, Patterns of potential magnetic field merging sites on the dayside magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 1739, 1984.
25. Lyons, L. R., G. Lu, O. de la Beaujardiere, and F. J. Rich, Synoptic maps of polar caps for stable interplanetary magnetic field intervals during January 1992 geospace environment modeling campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 27,283, 1996.
26. Mukai, T., S. Machida, Y. Saito, M. Hirahara, T. Terasawa, N. Kaya, T. Obara, M. Ejiri, and A. Nishida, The low energy particle (LEP) instrument onboard the Geotail satellite, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 46, 669, 1994.
27. Němeček, Z., A. Fedorov, J. Šafránková , and G. Zastenker, Structure of the low-latitude magnetopause: Magion-4 observation, Ann. Geophys., 15, 553, 1997.
28. Nishikawa, K., Particle entry through reconnection grooves in the magnetopause with a dawnward IMF as simulated by a three-dimensional particle code, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1609, 1998.
29. Ogilvie, K. W., et al., SWE, A comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 55, 1995.
30. Rich, F. J., and M. Hairston, Large-scale convection patterns observed by DMSP, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3827, 1994.
31. Russell, C. T., R. C. Snare. J. D. Means, D. Pierce, D. Dearborn, M. Larson, G. Barr, and G. Le, The GGS/Polar magnetic fields investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 563, 1995.
32. Šafránková, J., G. Zastenker, Z. Němeček, A. Fedorov, M Simersky, and L. Přech, Small scale observation of the magnetopause motion: Preliminary results of the Interball project, Ann. Geophys., 15, 562, 1997.
33. Šafránková, J., Z. Němeček, D. G. Sibeck, L. Přech, J. Měrka, and O. Santolík, Two point observation of high-latitude reconnection, Geophys. Res. Lett, 25, 4301, 1998.
34. Savin, S., et al., Interball magnetotail boundary case studies, Adv. Space Res., 19, 993, 1997.
35. Savin, S. P., et al., Interball-Tail probe measurements in the outer cusp and boundary layers, in Geospace Mass and Energy Flow, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol.104, edited by J. L. Horwitz, D. L. Gallagher, and W. K. Peterson, p. 25, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1998a.
36. Savin, S. P., S. A. Romanov, A. O. Federov, L. Zelenyi, S. I. Klimov, Y. I. Yermolaev, E. Y. Budnik, N. S. Nikolaeva, C. T. Russell, X.-W. Zhou, A. L. Urquhart, and P. H. Reiff, The cusp/magnetosheath interface on May 29,1996: Interball-1 and Polar observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2963, 1998b.
37. Savin, S., E. Budnik, M. Nozdrachev, V. Romanov, Y. Yermolaev, L. Zelenyi, J. Blecki, J. Buechner, and B. Nikutowski, On the plasma turbulence and transport at the polar cusp outer border, Czech. J. Phys., 49, 679, 1999.
38. Scudder, J. D., et al., HYDRA, A 3-dimensional electron and ion hot plasma instrument for the Polar spacecraft of the GGS mission, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 459, 1995.
39. Shelley, E. G., et al., The toroidal imaging mass-angle spectrograph (TIMAS) for the Polar mission, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 497, 1995.
40. White, W. W., G. L. Siscoe, G. M. Erickson, Z. Kaymaz, N. C. Maynard, K. D. Siebert, B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, and D. R. Weimer, The magnetospheric sash and cross-tail S, Geophys. Res. Lett, 25, 1605, 1998.
41. Yermolaev, Y. I., A. O. Federov, O. L. Vaisberg, V. M. Bale- namov, Y. A. Obed, R. Jiminez, J. Fleites, L. Llera, and A. N. Omelchenko, Ion distribution dynamics near the Earth's bow shock: First measurements with the twodimensional ion energy spectrometer CORALL on the Interball-Tail-probe satellite, Ann. Geophys., 15, 533, 1997.
42. G. M. Erickson and G. L. Siscoe, Center for Space Physics, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02543.
43. H. Kawano, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozake Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-881, Japan.
44. N. C. Maynard, D. R. Weimer, W. W. White, and G. R. Wilson, Mission Research Corporation, One Tara Boulevard, Suite 302, Nashua, NH 03062. (nmaynard@mrcnh.com; dweimer@mrcnh.com; bwhite@mrcnh.com; gwilson@mrcnh.com)
45. Z. Němeček and J. Šafránoková, Department of Electronics and Vacuum Physics, Charles University, V Holešovičkách 2, 180 00 Praha 8, Czech Republic.
46. W. K. Peterson, Lockheed Martin Palo Alto Research Laboratory, 701 Birch Street, Denver, CO 80220.
47. I. Sandahl, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, P. O. Box 812, S-981 Kiruna, Sweden.
48. S. P. Savin, Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 84/32, GSP-7, Moscow, 117810, Russia.
49. J. D. Scudder, Department of Space Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240. (jds@space-theory.physics.uiowa.edu)
50. B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755. (son-nerup@dartmouth.edu)