Electron-radiation interaction in a Penning trap: Beyond the dipole approximation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 3813-3821

  Martins, Ana M ^a   Mancini, Stefano ^b   Tombesi, Paolo ^b  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000498190     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.3813     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. W. Paul, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 531 (1990).RMPHAT
2. See, e.g., lectures by C. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips on laser cooling of neutral atoms and lectures by H. Walther and R. Blatt on laser cooling of trapped ions, in Fundamental Systems in Quantum Optics, 1990 Les Houches Lectures Session LIII, edited by J. Dalibard, J. M. Raimond, and J. Zinn-Justin (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992).
3. F. M. Penning, Physica (Amsterdam) 3, 873 (1936).PHYSAG
4. R. S. Van Dyck, Jr., P. B. Schwinberg, and H. G. Dehmelt, in Atomic Physics 9, edited by R. S. Van Dyck, Jr. and E. N. Fortson (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984).
5. L. S. Brown and G. Gabrielse, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986).RMPHAT
6. I. Marzoli and P. Tombesi, Europhys. Lett. 24, 515 (1993).EULEEJ
7. S. Mancini and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1679 (1997).PLRAAN
8. G. Gabrielse, H. Dehmelt, and W. Kells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 537 (1985).PRLTAO
9. There can be some limiting conditions on the existence of such waves due to the trap electrodes
10. however, one can develop the same theory for other geometries, such as cylindrical traps [see, e.g., G. Gabrielse and J. Tan, in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, edited by P. R. Berman (Academic, London, 1994)].
11. S. Mancini and P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. A 56, 3060 (1997).PLRAAN
12. See, e.g., D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
13. E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935); NATWAY
14. NaturwissenschaftenE. Schrödinger 23, 823 (1935);
15. NaturwissenschaftenE. Schrödinger 23, 844 (1935).
16. The projector in Eq. (41) should be, in reality, a projector on an interval of values for (Formula presented) that accounts for the uncertainty arising by relating the electric current at the readout circuit with the axial observable. However, here, for simplicity, we are not considering the dynamics of the readout apparatus [a detailed treatment of this subject in terms of input-output theory is given by I. Marzoli, M.S. thesis, University of Camerino, 1992 (unpublished)].
17. B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 13 (1986).PRLTAO
18. C. W. Gardiner, Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
19. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 485 (1989).PRLTAO
20. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44 (10), 36 (1991).PHTOAD
21. See, e.g., J. Eades et al., CERN Report No. PSSC/89-15, p. 118, 1989 (unpublished).