A re-assessment of relationships within epacridaceae

Annals of Botany

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 305-316

  Powell, J M ^a,e   Crayn, D M ^b,f   Gadek, P A ^b   Quinn, C J ^b   Morrison, D A ^c   Chapman, A R ^d  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS AND DOMAIN TRUST   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION   (Australia)

^e Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Mgmt T   (Australia)

^f JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cladistic; Epacridaceae; Morphology; Phylogeny; Relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000492652     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0036     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderberg AA. 1993. Cladistic interrelationships and major clades of the Ericales. Plant Systematics and Evolution 184: 207-231.
2. Arroyo S. 1975. Lebetanthus, genero austroamericano de Epacridaceae y sus diferencias con el genero Prionotes de Tasmania. Darwinia 19: 312-330.
3. Bentham G. 1869. Flora Australiensis. Vol. 4. London: Reeve & Co.
4. Bentham G, Hooker JD. 1876. Genera Plantarum. Vol. 2. London: Reeve & Co.
5. Bremer B. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogeny reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. Briggs BG, Johnson LAS. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae - evidence from inflorescence structure. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 102: 157-266.
7. Brown R. 1810. Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen. London: Johnson.
8. Burtt BL. 1948. Studies in Ericales VIII. The taxonomic position of Wittsteinia. Kew Bulletin 3: 493-495.
9. Copeland HF. 1954. Observations on certain Epacridaceae. American Journal of Botany 1: 215-221.
10. Donaghue MD, Olmstead RG, Smith JF, Palmer JD. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanic Garden 79: 333-345.
11. Dormer KJ. 1945. Morphology of the vegetative shoot in Epacridaceae. New Phytologist 44: 149-152.
12. Drude O. 1889. Epacridaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Edn.1. Leipzig: Engelmann, 66-79.
13. Eriksson T. 1995. Auto Decay version 2.4. Harvard University Herbaria. (copies of this program are freely available via electronic mail from torsten.eriksson@botan.su.se).
14. Farris JS. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. American Naturalist 106: 645-668.
15. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. Hickey LJ. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany 60: 17-33.
17. Hooker WJ. 1837. Icones Plantarum. Oxford : Blackwell.
18. Hutchinson J. 1969. Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants. Dicotyledons: facts and theory. London: Academic Press.
19. Judd WS, Kron KA. 1993. Circumscription of Ericaceae (Ericales) as determined by preliminary cladistic analyses based on morphological, anatomical, and embryological features. Brittonia 45: 99-114.
20. Kron KA, Chase MW. 1993. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 735-741.
21. Lem K. 1964. Evolutionary studies in the Ericaceae II. Leaf anatomy as a phylogenetic index in the Andromedeae. Botantical Gazette 125: 178-186.
22. Maddison WP, Donaghue MJ, Maddison DR. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Systematic Zoolology 33: 83-103.
23. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MaC Clade: An analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Versions 3.01. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
24. Maiden JH, Campbell WS. 1898. The flowering plants and ferns of New South Wales. Sydney: Government. Printer.
25. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Vol. 2. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 840.
26. Morrison DA, Powell JM. 1990. Systematics and evolution of the Epacridaceae. In: Abstracts, 9th Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, 23-27 August, 1990, Canberra, Australia.
27. Mueller F von. 1864. Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae 4: Melbourne: Govt. Printer, 95
28. Mueller F von. 1867. Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae 6. Melbourne: Govt. Printer, 29-76.
29. Mueller F von. 1875. Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae 9. Melbourne: Govt. Printer, 48.
30. Mueller F von. 1882. Systematic census of Australian plants. Part I - Vasculares. Melbourne: McCarron Bird.
31. Mueller F von. 1889. Second systematic census of Australian plants. Part I - Vasculares. Melbourne: McCarron Bird.
32. Oliver WRB. 1928. A revision of the genus Dracophyllum. Royal Society of New Zealand Transactions 59: 678-714.
33. Powell JM, Chapman AR, Doust ANL. 1987. Classification and generic status in the Epacridaceae: a preliminary analysis. Australian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 53: 70-78.
34. Smith-White S. 1948. A survey of chromosome numbers in the Epacridaceae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 73: 37-56.
35. Smith-White S. 1955. Chromosome numbers and pollen types in the Epacridaceae. Australian Journal of Botany 3: 48-67.
36. Stevens PF. 1971. A classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 1-53.
37. Sweet R. 1828. Flora Australasica. London: Ridgeway.
38. Swofford DL. 1993. PAUP - Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
39. Telford IRH. 1992. Budawangia and Rupicola, new and revised genera of Epacridaceae. Telopea 5: 229-239.
40. Van Steenis CGGF. 1984. A synopsis of Alseuosmiaceae in New Zealand, New Caledonia, Australia and New Guinea. Blumea 29: 387-394.
41. Watson L. 1962a. A taxonomic revision of the genus Andersonia R. Br: (Epacridaceae). Kew Bulletin 16: 85-127.
42. Watson L. 1962b. The taxonomic significance of stomatal distribution and morphology in Epacridaceae. New Phytologist 61: 36-40.
43. Watson L. 1967. Taxonomic implications of a comparative anatomical study of Epacridaceae. New Phytologist 66: 495-504.
44. Watson L, Williams WT, Lance GN. 1966. Angiosperm taxonomy: a comparative study of some novel numerical techniques. Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany) 9: 491-501.
45. Watson L, Williams WT, Lance GN. 1967. A mixed-data numerical approach to angiosperm taxonomy: the classification of the Ericales. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 178: 25-35.
46. Weiller CM, Crowden RK, Powell JM. 1994. Morphology and taxonomic significance of leaf epicuticular waxes in the Epacridaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 7: 125-152.