Mean and variance modeling with qualitative responses: A case study

Quality Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 141-148

  Borror, Connie M ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central composite designs; Normality; Optimization; Qualitative responses; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000480392     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08982119808919219     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M., Experimental Designs, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992.
2. Montgomery, D. C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997.
3. Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C., Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.
4. Minitab, Release 11.13, Minitab, Inc., State College, PA, 1996.
5. Design-Expert, Version 3.0.4C, Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, 1992.
6. Khuri, A. I. and Cornell, J. A., Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1996.
7. Box, G. E. P., Hunter, G. W., and Hunter, J. S., Statistics for Experimenters, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.
8. Bowles, M. L. and Montgomery, D. C., How to Formulate the Ultimate Margarita: A Tutorial on Experiments with Mixtures, Qual. Eng., 10(2), 239-253 (1997).