Multicanonical Procedure for Continuum Peptide Models

Journal of Computational Chemistry

Volumn 21, Issue 14, 2000, Pages 1251-1261

  Yaşar, Fatih ^a   Çelik, Tarik ^a   Berg, Bernd A ^b   Meirovitch, Hagai ^c  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Florida State University   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy minimization; Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithms; Multicanonical simulation; Peptides; Proteins

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000464214     PISSN: 01928651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1096-987X(20001115)21:14<1251::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-O     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Vásquez, M.; Némethy, G.; Scheraga, H. A. Chem Rev 1994, 94, 2183-2239.
2. (a) Kessler, H.; Griesinger, C.; Lautz, J.; Muller, A.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Berendsen, H. J. C. J Am Chem Soc 1988, 110, 3393-3396;
3. (b) Brüschweiler, R.; Blackledge, M.; Ernst, R. R. J Biomol NMR 1991, 1, 3-11;
4. (c) Cicero, D. O.; Barbato, G.; Bazzo, R. J Am Chem Soc 1995, 117, 1027-1033.
5. Baysal, C.; Meirovitch, H. J Am Chem Soc 1998, 120, 800-812.
6. Metropolis, N.; Rosenbluth, A. W.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H.; Teller, E. J Chem Phys 1953, 21, 1087-1092.
7. (a) Alder, B. J.; Wainwright, T. E. J Chem Phys 1957, 27, 1208-1209;
8. (b) McCammon, J. A.; Gelin, B. R.; Karpus, M. Nature 1977, 267, 585-590.
9. (a) Saunders, M. J Am Chem Soc 1987, 109, 3150-3152;
10. (b) Saunders, M. J Comput Chem 1991, 12, 645-663;
11. (c) Gotō, H.; Ōsawa, E. J Am Chem Soc 1989, 111, 8950-8951;
12. (d) Gotō, H.; Ōsawa, E. Tetrahed Lett 1992, 33, 1343-1346;
13. (e) Chang, G.; Guida, W. C.; Still, W. C. J Am Chem Soc 1989, 111, 4379-4386;
14. (f) Saunders, M.; Houk, K. N.; Wu, Y.-D.; Still, W. C.; Lipton, M.; Chang, G.; Guida, W. C. J Am Chem Soc 1990, 112, 1419-1427;
15. (g) Braun, W. Biopolymers 1987, 26, 1691-1704;
16. (h) Goodman, J. M.; Still, W. C. J Comput Chem 1991, 12, 1110-1117;
17. (i) Kollosváry, I.; Guida, W. C. J Am Chem Soc 1996, 118, 5011-5019.
18. Li, Z.; Scheraga, H. A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987, 84, 6611-6615.
19. (a) Gō, N.; Scheraga, H. A. J Chem Phys 1969, 51, 4751-4767;
20. (b) Gibson, K. D.; Scheraga, H. A. Physiol Chem Phys 1969, 1, 109-126;
21. (c) Gō, N.; Scheraga, H. A. Macromolecules 1976, 9, 535-542.
22. Hagler, A. T.; Stern, P. S.; Sharon, R.; Becker, J. M.; Naider, F. J Am Chem Soc 1979, 101, 6842-6852.
23. (a) Karplus, M.; Kushick, J. N. Macromolecules 1981, 14, 325-332;
24. (b) Case, D. A. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994, 4, 285-290.
25. (a) Meirovitch, H. Chem Phys Lett 1977, 21, 389-392;
26. (b) Meirovitch, H.; Vásquez, M.; Scheraga, H. A. Biopolymers 1987, 26, 651-671;
27. (c) Meirovitch, H.; Koerber, S. C.; Rivier, J.; Hagler, A. T. Biopolymers 1994, 34, 815-839.
28. (a) Berg, B. A.; Neuhaus, T. Phys Lett B 1991, 267, 249-253;
29. (b) Phys Rev Lett 1992, 68, 9-12.
30. Berg, B. A.; Celik, T. Phys Rev Lett 1992, 69, 2292-2295.
31. Hansmann, U. H.; Okamoto, Y. J Comput Chem 1993, 14, 1333-1338.
32. (a) Hao, M.-H.; Scheraga, H. A. J Phys Chem 1994, 98, 4940-4948;
33. (b) J Phys Chem 1994, 98, 9882-9893.
34. (a) Kolinski, A.; Galazka, W.; Skolnick, J. Prot 1996, 26, 271-287;
35. (b) Higo, J.; Nakajima, N.; Shirai, H.; Kidera, A.; Nakamura, H. J Comput Chem 1997, 18, 2086-2092.
36. Hansmann, U. H.; Okamoto, Y. Annu Rev Comput Phys 1999, 5, 129-157.
37. (a) Ferrenberg, A. M.; Swendsen, R. H. Phys Rev Lett 1988, 61, 2635-2638;
38. (b) Ferrenberg, A. M.; Swendsen, R. H. Phys Rev Lett 1989, 63, 1658-1658.
39. Berg, B. A. J Stat Phys 1996, 82, 323-342.
40. Berg, B. A. Nucl Phys B 1998, 63(Suppl.)A-C, 982-984.
41. Mitsutake, A.; Okamoto, Y. Chem Phys Lett 1999, 309, 95-100.
42. (a) Momany, F. A.; McGuire, R. F.; Burgess, A. W.; Scheraga, H. A. J Phys Chem 1975, 79, 2361-2381;
43. (b) Sippl, M. J.; Némethy, G.; Scheraga, H. A. J Phys Chem 1984, 88, 6231-6233.
44. Eisenmenger, F.; Hansmann, U. H. J Phys Chem 1997, 101, 3304-3310.
45. Hansmann, U. H.; Okamoto, Y. Prot Struct Funct Genet 1999, 34, 472-483.
46. Berg, B. A. Fields Inst Commun (to appear).
47. Huang, K. Statistical Mechanics; Wiley: New York, 1963, Chapter 8.
48. One can avoid the problem by increasing, say doubling, the computer time after each (m - 1) → m step. But, it is clear that the amount of computer time needed will be prohibitive, unless the system is very small. On the contrary, to get away quickly from the narrow energy range of the initial canonical simulation, one should perform frequent updates of the weights, during which the major limitation is instability due to statistical noise.
49. Lee, J. Phys Rev Lett 1993, 71, 211-214.
50. (a) von Freyberg, B.; Schaumann, T.; Braun, W. FANTOM User's Manual and Instructions; ETH Zürich, Zürich, 1993;
51. (b) von Freyberg, B.; Braun, W. J Comput Chem 1993, 14, 510-521.
52. Meirovitch, H.; Meirovitch, E.; Lee, J. J Phys Chem 1995, 99, 4847-4854.
53. Miller, R. Biometrika 1974, 61, 1-15.
54. de Gennes, P. G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, 1985.
55. (a) Meirovitch, H.; Meirovitch, E. J Phys Chem 1996, 100, 5123-5133;
56. (b) Baysal, C.; Meirovitch, H. Biopolymers 1999, 50, 329-344.
57. (a) Meirovitch, H.; Meirovitch, E. J Comput Chem 1997, 18, 240-253;
58. (b) Meirovitch, H.; Vásquez, M. Theochem 1997, 398-399, 517-522.