Energies and analytic gradients for a coupled-cluster doubles model using variational Brueckner orbitals: Application to symmetry breaking in O4+

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 109, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 4171-4181

  Sherrill, C David ^a   Krylov, Anna I ^a   Byrd, Edward F C ^a   Head Gordon, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000458644     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.477023     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 96, 508 (1954).
2. R. K. Nesbet, Phys. Rev. 109, 1632 (1958).
3. C. D. Sherrill and H. F. Schaefer, Adv. Quantum Chem. (in press).
4. N. C. Handy, J. A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, K. Raghavachari, and G. W. Trucks, Chem. Phys. Lett. 164, 185 (1989).
5. J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5554 (1992).
6. L. A. Barnes and R. Lindh, Chem. Phys. Lett. 223, 207 (1994).
7. R. A. Chiles and C. E. Dykstra, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 4544 (1981).
8. C. Hampel, K. A. Peterson, and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 190, 1 (1992).
9. G. D. Purvis and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 1910 (1982).
10. J. A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, and K. Raghavachari, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5968 (1987).
11. K. K. Raghavachari, J. A. Pople, E. S. Replogle, M. Head-Gordon, and N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 167, 115 (1990).
12. G. E. Scuseria, Chem. Phys. Lett. 226, 251 (1994).
13. R. Kobayashi, N. C. Handy, R. D. Amos, G. W. Trucks, M. J. Frisch, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6723 (1991).
14. R. Kobayashi, R. D. Amos, and N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett. 184, 195 (1991).
15. T. J. Lee, R. Kobayashi, N. C. Handy, and R. D. Amos, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 8931 (1992).
16. R. Kobayashi, H. Koch, P. Jørgensen, and T. J. Lee, Chem. Phys. Lett. 211, 94 (1993).
17. R. Kobayashi, R. D. Amos, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 1375 (1994).
18. E. R. Davidson and W. T. Borden, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 4783 (1983).
19. W. D. Allen, D. A. Horner, R. L. DeKock, R. B. Remington, and H. F. Schaefer, Chem. Phys. 133, 11 (1989).
20. T. D. Crawford, T. J. Lee, N. C. Handy, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9980 (1997).
21. G. E. Scuseria and H. F. Schaefer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 142, 354 (1987).
22. G. D. Purvis, R. Shepard, F. B. Brown, and R. J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 23, 835 (1983).
23. A. P. L. Rendell, G. B. Backsay, N. S. Hush, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5976 (1987).
24. N. C. Handy and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5031 (1984).
25. P. Pulay, Chem. Phys. Lett. 73, 393 (1980).
26. A. I. Krylov, C. D. Sherrill, E. F. C. Byrd, and M. Head-Gordon (manuscript in preparation).
27. M. Head-Gordon and J. A. Pople, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 3063 (1988).
28. J. A. Pople, R. Krishnan, H. B. Schlegel, and J. S. Binkley, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 545 (1978).
29. R. J. Bartlett and G. D. Purvis, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 561 (1978).
30. ab.
31. G. Fitzgerald, R. J. Harrison, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5143 (1986).
32. L. Adamowicz, W. D. Laidig, and R. J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 18, 244 (1984).
33. A. C. Scheiner, G. E. Scuseria, J. E. Rice, T. J. Lee, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5361 (1987).
34. E. A. Salter, G. W. Trucks, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1752 (1989).
35. J. Gauss, W. J. Lauderdale, J. F. Stanton, J. D. Watts, and R. J. Bartlett, Chem. Phys. Lett. 182, 207 (1991).
36. J. Gauss, J. F. Stanton, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 2639 (1991).
37. J. Gauss, J. F. Stanton, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2623 (1991).
38. M. J. Frisch, M. Head-Gordon, and J. A. Pople, Chem. Phys. Lett. 166, 275 (1990).
39. Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Osamura, J. D. Goddard, and H. F. Schaefer, A New Dimension to Quantum Chemistry: Analytic Derivative Methods in Ab initio Molecular Electronic Structure Theory (Oxford, New York, 1994).
40. J. E. Rice and R. D. Amos, Chem. Phys. Lett. 122, 585 (1985).
41. I. Shavitt, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 12, 5 (1978).
42. B. R. Brooks and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 5092 (1979).
43. P. Saxe, D. J. Fox, H. F. Schaefer, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 5584 (1982).
44. P. Pulay, Mol. Phys. 17, 197 (1969).
45. J. D. Goddard, N. C. Handy, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 1525 (1979).
46. B. R. Brooks, W. D. Laidig, P. Saxe, J. D. Goddard, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 4652 (1980).
47. J. E. Rice, R. D. Amos, N. C. Handy, T. J. Lee, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 963 (1986).
48. J. A. Pople, R. Krishnan, H. B. Schlegel, and J. S. Binkley, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 13, 225 (1979).
49. P. Saxe, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 5647 (1982).
50. S. Huzinaga, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 1293 (1965).
51. T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 2823 (1970).
52. T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 716 (1971).
53. W. J. Hehre, R. Ditchfield, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2257 (1972).
54. P. C. Hariharan and J. A. Pople, Theor. Chim. Acta 28, 213 (1973).
55. B. G. Johnson, P. M. W. Gill, M. Head-Gordon, C. A. White, D. R. Maurice, T. R. Adams, J. Kong, M. Challacombe, E. Schwegler, M. Oumi, C. Ochsenfeld, N. Ishikawa, J. Florian, R. D. Adamson, J. P. Dombroski, R. L. Graham, and A. Warshel, Q-Chem 1.1, Q-Chem, Inc., Export, PA, 1997.
56. C. L. Janssen, E. T. Seidl, G. E. Scuseria, T. P. Hamilton, Y. Yamaguchi, R. B. Remington, Y. Xie, G. Vacek, C. D. Sherrill, T. D. Crawford, J. T. Fermann, W. D. Allen, B. R. Brooks, G. B. Fitzgerald, D. J. Fox, J. F. Gaw, N. C. Handy, W. D. Laidig, T. J. Lee, R. M. Pitzer, J. E. Rice, P. Saxe, A. C. Scheiner, and H. F. Schaefer, PSI 2.0.8, PSITECH, Inc., Watkinsville, GA30677, U.S.A., 1995. This program is generally available for a handling fee of $100.
57. ACES II program is a product of the Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, J. D. Watts, M. Nooijen, N. Oliphant, S. A. Perera, P. G. Szalay, W. J. Lauderdale, S. R. Gwaltney, S. Beck, A. Balková, D. E. Bernholdt, K.-K. Baeck, H. Sekino, P. Rozyczko, C. Huber, and R. J. Bartlett.
58. Integral packages included are VMOL (J. Almlöf and P. R. Taylor)
59. VPROPS (P. R. Taylor), and a modified version of the ABACUS integral derivative package (T. U. Helgaker, H. J. Aa. Jensen, J. Olsen, P. Jørgensen, and P. R. Taylor).
60. A. R. Hoy, I. M. Mills, and G. Strey, Mol. Phys. 24, 1265 (1972).
61. A. R. Hoy and P. R. Bunker, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 74, 1 (1979).
62. K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg, Constants of Diatomic Molecules (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1979).
63. W. E. Thompson and M. E. Jacox, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 3826 (1989).
64. R. Lindh and L. A. Barnes, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 224 (1994).
65. T. D. Crawford, J. F. Stanton, W. D. Allen, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 10626 (1997).
66. N. A. Burton, Y. Yamaguchi, I. L. Alberts, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7466 (1991).
67. T. D. Crawford, J. F. Stanton, P. Szalay, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 2525 (1997).
68. D. B. Cook, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 82, 187 (1986).
69. A. D. McLean, B. H. Lengsfield, J. Pacansky, and Y. Ellinger, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 3567 (1985).
70. R. S. Grev, I. L. Alberts, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 3379 (1990).
71. Y. Xie, W. D. Allen, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 7615 (1996).
72. M. E. Jacox and W. E. Thompson, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 750 (1994).
73. T. D. Crawford and J. F. Stanton, private communication.
74. J. F. Stanton and J. Gauss, Analytic evaluation of second derivatives of the energy: Computational strategies for the CCSD and CCSD(T) approximations, in Recent Advances in Coupled-Cluster Methods, edited by R. J. Bartlett, volume 3 of Recent Advances in Computational Chemistry (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), pp. 49-79.
75. E. A. Salter, H. Sekino, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 502 (1987).
76. Y. Yamaguchi, I. L. Alberts, J. D. Goddard, and H. F. Schaefer, Chem. Phys. 147, 309 (1990).
77. The UHF stability analysis was performed using ACES II, while the ROHF stability analysis was obtained using PSI and allowed only spin-conserving rotations.
78. A preliminary investigation indicates that the analytic ROHF second derivatives are not rapidly varying as a function of nuclear configuration, as would be expected for cases where anomalous vibrational frequencies are directly driven by Hartree-Fock instabilities.