Dynamical [Formula presented] models of structure formation

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1851-1859

  Coble, Kimberly ^a   Dodelson, Scott ^b   Frieman, Joshua A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NASA FERMILAB ASTROPHYSICS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000440905     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1851     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1917, 142 (1917). This article is translated into English in J. Bernstein and G. Feinberg, Cosmological Constants (Columbia University, New York, 1986).
2. J. P. Ostriker and P. J. Steinhardt, Nature (London)377, 600 (1995);
3. L. Krauss and M. S. Turner, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.27, 1137 (1995). GRGVA8
4. For earlier discussions, see M. S. Turner, G. Steigman, and L. Krauss, Phys. Rev. D52, 2090 (1984);
5. P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J.284, 439 (1984);
6. L. Kofman and A. A. Starobinskii, Sov. Astron. Lett.11, 271 (1985);
7. G. Efstathiou, Nature (London)348, 705 (1990);
8. M. S. Turner, Phys. Scr.T36, 167 (1991).
9. R. Carlberg et al., Astrophys. J.462, 32 (1996).
10. G. Efstathiou, S. Maddox, and W. Sutherland, Nature (London)348, 705 (1990);
11. L. Kofman, N. Gnedin, and N. Bahcall, Astrophys. J.413, 1 (1993).
12. J. A. Peacock and S. J. Dodds, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.267, 1020 (1994).MNRAA4
13. Strictly speaking, “standard” CDM usually refers to the parameter choice (Formula presented) and (Formula presented); while such a model yields a better shape for (Formula presented) than does an (Formula presented) model with (Formula presented), the fit to the data is still poor.
14. See K. M. Gorski et al., Astrophys. J.464, L11 (1996);
15. E. L. Wright et al., 464, L21 (1996);
16. G. Hinshaw et al., 464, L17 (1996) for analyses of the four-year COBE data.
17. R. Stompor, K. M. Gorski, and A. J. Banday, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.277, 1225 (1995).MNRAA4
18. S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J.440, L1 (1995).
19. C. S. Kochanek, Astrophys. J.466, 638 (1996);
20. 419, 12 (1993);
21. D. Maoz and H.-W. Rix, 416, 425 (1993).
22. S. D. M. White, G. Efstathiou, and C. Frenk, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.262, 1023 (1993).MNRAA4
23. P. Viana and A. Liddle, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.281, 323 (1996).MNRAA4
24. A. Klypin, J. Primack, and J. Holtzman, Astrophys. J.466, 13 (1996).
25. H. J. Mo and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (1996);G. Kauffmann, A. Nusser, and M. Steinmetz, Report No. astro-ph/9512009 (unpublished).
26. Another fix for the amplitude problem is to introduce a small tilt to the primordial power spectrum, (Formula presented), with (Formula presented). In the models of Fig. 11, we have assumed a scale-invariant primordial spectrum with (Formula presented), but inflationary models typically predict small deviations from this, with (Formula presented) less than unity in models with a single scalar field; see, e.g.
27. F. Adams et al., Phys. Rev. D47, 426 (1993). Tilted spectra in (Formula presented) models have been examined in A. R. Liddle et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 281 (1996); S. Dodelson, E. Gates, and M. S. Turner, Science 374, 69 (1996).
28. J. Frieman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2077 (1995).
29. For discussions of other scalar field and phenomenological models of a time-varying vacuum energy, see, e.g., K. Freese et al., Nucl. Phys.B287, 797 (1987);
30. M. Ozer and M. Taha, B287, 776 (1987);
31. B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D37, 3406 (1988);
32. W. Chen and Y. Wu, 41, 695 (1990);
33. J. Carvalho, J. Lima, and I. Waga, 46, 2404 (1992);
34. V. Silveira and I. Waga, 50, 4890 (1994);
35. J. Lopez and D. Nanopoulos, Mod. Phys. Lett. A11, 1 (1996);
36. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Report No. YITP/K-1098, 1995 (unpublished).
37. The constraints from Type Ia supernova observations are also different in these models from conventional (Formula presented) models; J. Frieman and I. Waga (in preparation).
38. J. Bartlett et al., Science267, 980 (1995). A less extreme proposal was put forth by
39. M. White et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.276, L69 (1995).MNRAA4
40. J. R. Bond and G. Efstathiou, Phys. Lett. B265, 245 (1991);
41. S. Dodelson, G. Gyuk, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett.72,3578 (1994).
42. M. White and E. F. Bunn, Astrophys. J. 450, 477 (1995);
43. G. Efstathiou, J. R. Bond, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.258, 1P (1992).MNRAA4
44. W. Hu and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D51, 2599 (1995).
45. C. Hill and G. Ross, Nucl. Phys.B311, 253 (1988);
46. Phys. Lett. B203, 125 (1988).
47. J. Frieman, C. Hill, and R. Watkins, Phys. Rev. D46, 1226 (1992).
48. J. A. Peacock and S. J. Dodds, Report No. astro-ph/9603031, 1996 (unpublished). See also
49. B. Jain, H. J. Mo, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.276, L25 (1995).MNRAA4
50. A. J. S. Hamilton, P. Kumar, E. Lu, and A. Matthews, Astrophys. J.374, L1 (1991).
51. G. Efstathiou in Physics of the Early Universe, edited by J. A. Peacock, A. F. Heavens, and A. T. Davies (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, England, 1990).