A single general method for the analysis of cross-classified data: Reconciliation and synthesis of some methods of pearson, yule, and fisher, and also some methods of correspondence analysis and association analysis

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 91, Issue 433, 1996, Pages 408-428

  Goodman, Leo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Association analysis; Canonical correlation; Contingency table analysis; Correspondence analysis; Generalized nonindependence models and quasi symmetry models; Graphical displays; Measures of association

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000440575     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476702     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agresti, A. (1990), Categorical Data Analysis, New York: John Wiley.
2. Baccini, A., Caussinus, H., and de Falguerolles, A. (1993), “Analyzing Dependence in Large Contingency Tables: Dimensionality and Patterns in Scatterplots,” in Multivariate Analysis. Future Directions 2, eds. C. M. Cuadras and C. R. Rao, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 245-263.
3. Becker, M. P. (1990), “Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of the RC(M) Association Model,” Applied Statistics, 39, 152-167.
4. Becker, M. P., and Clogg, C. C. (1989), “Analysis of Sets of Two-Way Contingency Tables Using Association Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 142-151.
5. Benzécri, J.-P. (1973), L'Analyse des Données'. 1. La Taxonomie: 2. L'Analyse des Correspondances, Paris: Dunod (2nd éd., 1976).
6. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975), Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964), “An Analysis of Transformations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 26, 211-243.
8. Burt, C. (1950), “The Factorial Analysis of Qualitative Data,” British Journal of Psychology, 3, 166-185.
9. Caussinus, H. (1966), “Contribution à l'Analyse Statistique de Tableaux de Corrélation,” Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de V Université de Toulouse, 29, 77-182.
10. Clogg, C. C., and Shihadeh, E. W. (1994), Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Escoufier, Y., and Junca, S. (1986), Discussion of “Some Useful Extensions of the Usual Correspondence Analysis Approach and the Usual Log-Linear Models Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables,” by L. A. Goodman, International Statistical Review, 54, 279-283.
12. Fisher, R. A. (1940), 'The Precision of Discriminant Functions,” Annals of Eugenics, London, 10, 422-429.
13. Freeman, M. F., and Tukey, J. W. (1950), “Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21,607-611.
14. Gabriel, K. R. (1971), “The Biplot Graphic Display of Matrices With Application to Principal Component Analysis,” Biometrika, 54, 453-467.
15. Gilula, Z., and Haberman, S. J. (1986), “Canonical Analysis of Contigency Tables by Maximum Likelihood,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 780-788.
16. Goodman, L. A. (1979), “Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537-552.
17. Goodman, L. A. (1981a), “Association Models and the Bivariate Normal for Contingency Tables With Ordered Categories,” Biometrika, 68, 347-355.
18. Goodman, L. A. (1981b), “Association Models and Canonical Correlation in the Analysis of Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 320-334.
19. Goodman, L. A. (1981c), “Criteria for Determining Whether Certain Categories in a Cross-Classification Table Should be Combined, With Special Reference to Occupational Categories in an Occupational Mobility Table,” American Journal of Sociology, 87, 612-650.
20. Goodman, L. A. (1983), “The Analysis of Dependence in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories Using Log-Linear Models for Frequencies and Log-Linear Models for Odds,” Biometrika, 39, 149-160.
21. Goodman, L. A. (1984), The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Goodman, L. A. (1985), “The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered and/or Unordered Categories: Association Models, Correlation Models, and Asymmetry Models for Contingency Tables With or Without Missing Entries,” The Annals of Statistics, 13, 10-69.
23. Goodman, L. A. (1986), “Some Useful Extensions of the Usual Correspondence Analysis Approach and the Usual Log-Linear Models Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables” (with discussion), International Statistical Review, 54, 243-309.
24. Goodman, L. A. (1987), “New Methods for Analyzing the Intrinsic Character of Qualitative Variables Using Cross-Classified Data,” American Journal of Sociology, 94, 529-583.
25. Goodman, L. A. (1991), “Measures, Models, and Graphical Displays in the Analysis of Cross-Classified Data” (with discussion), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 1085-1138.
26. Goodman, L. A. (1993), “Correspondence Analysis, Association Analysis, and Generalized Nonindependence Analysis of Contingency Tables: Saturated and Unsaturated Models and Appropriate Graphical Displays,” in Multivariate Analysis. Future Directions 2, eds. C. M. Cuadras and C. R. Rao, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 265-294.
27. Goodman, L. A. (1995), “Statistical Methods, Graphical Displays, and Tukey’s Ladder of Re-Expression in the Analysis of Nonindependence in Contin-gency Tables: Correspondence Analysis, Association Analysis, and the Midway View of Nonindependence,” Festschrift in Honor of John W. Tukey, ed. Stephan Morgenthaler.
28. Goodman, L. A., and Kruskal, W. H. (1954), “Measures of Association for Cross-Classifications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-784.
29. Goodman, L. A., and Kruskal, W. H. (1959), “Measures of Association for Cross-Classifications. II: Further Discussion and References,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54, 123-163.
30. Goodman, L. A., and Kruskal, W. H. (1979), Measures of Association for Cross Classifications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Greenacre, M. J. (1984), Theory and Application of Correspondence Analysis, London: Academic Press.
32. Guttman, L. (1941), “The Quantification of a Class of Attributes,” in The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, prepared for the Committee on Social Adjustment under the direction of the Subcommittee on Predictions of Social Adjustment: S. A. Stoufer, E. W. Burgess, L. S. Cottrell, Jr., E. L. Kelly, and M. W. Richardson, New York: Social Science Research Council, pp. 319-348.
33. Guttman, L. (1950), “The Principal Components of Scale Analysis,” in Measurement and Prediction. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II (Vol. 4), eds. S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazars- feld, S. A. Star, and J. A. Clausen, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 312-361.
34. Hartley, H. O. (1935). Also known as Hirschfeld (1935).
35. Hayashi, C. (1950), “On the Quantification of Qualitative Data From the Mathematico-Statistical Point of View,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2, 35-47.
36. Hirschfeld, H. O. (1935), “A Connection Between Correlation and Contingency,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31, 520-524.
37. Horst, P. (1935), “Measuring Complex Attitudes,” Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 369-374.
38. Hotelling, H. (1933), “Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417-441, 498-520.
39. Hotelling, H. (1936), “Relations Between Two Sets of Variables,” Biometrika, 28, 321-377.
40. Maung, K. (1941), “Measurement of Association in a Contingency Table With Special Reference to the Pigmentation of Hair and Eye Color in Scottish School Children,” Annals of Eugenics, London, 11, 189-223.
41. Pearson, K. (1913), “On the Measurement of the Influence of 'Broad Categories' on Correlation,” Biometrika, 9, 116-139.
42. Pearson, K., and Heron, D. (1913), “On Theories of Association,” Biometrika, 9, 159-315.
43. Richardson, M., and Kuder, G. F. (1933), “Making a Rating Scale That Measures,” Personnel Journal, 12, 36-40.
44. Rom, D., and Sarkar, S. K. (1992), “A Generalized Model for the Analysis of Association in Ordinal Contingency Tables,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 33, 205-212.
45. Scheffe, H. (1959), The Analysis of Variance, New York: John Wiley.
46. Tukey, J. W. (1957), “On the Comparative Anatomy of Transformations,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28, 602-632.
47. Williams, E. J. (1952), “Use of Scores for the Analysis of Association in Contingency Tables,” Biometrika, 39, 274-280.
48. Yule, G. U. (1900), “On the Association of Attributes in Statistics,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Ser. A, 194, 257-319.
49. Yule, G. U. (1912), “On the Methods of Measuring Association Between Two Attributes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75, 579-642.
50. Yule, G. U. (1916), An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, London: Griffin.
51. Yule, G. U., and Kendall, M. G. (1937), An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, London: Griffin.