Meaning analysis of inflected words

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 253-259

  Laine, Matti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000412908     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755799     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baayen, H., Burani, C., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 13-33). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
2. Baayen, R.H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
3. Bergman, M.W., Hudson, P.T.W., & Eling, P.A.T.M. (1988). How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 41-72.
4. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 55-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Hawkins, J.A., & Cutler, A. (1988). Psycholinguistic factors in morphological asymmetry. In J.A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 280-317). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Hudson, P.T.W., & Buijs, D. (1995). Left-to-right processing of derivational morphology. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 383-396). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Karlsson, F. (1983). Suomen kielen äänne-ja muntorakenne [Finnish phonology and morphology]. Juva: WSOY.
8. Klimesch, W. (1987). A connectivity model for semantic processing. Psychological Research, 49, 53-61.
9. Laine, M., & Koivisto, M. (1998). Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision. Psychological Research, 61, 220-229.
10. Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 457-502.
11. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423-446.
12. Östman, J.-O. (1995). Recasting the deictic foundations, using physics and Finnish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.). Essays in semantics and pragmatics in honor of Charles J. Fillmore (pp. 247-278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 227-269.
14. Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. In D. Besner, T Waller, & G. MacKinnon (Eds.). Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol 5. (pp. 83-123). New York: Academic Press.
15. Taft. (1988). A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation. Linguistics, 26, 657-667.
16. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
17. Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.