Subtree Analysis, Nothofagus and Pacific Biogeography

Cladistics

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 125-129

  Ladiges, Pauline Y ^a   Nelson, Gareth ^b   Grimes, James ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOTHOFAGUS;

EID: 0000403476     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00246.x     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Brundin, L. (1966). Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chronomid midges with a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteninae and the austral Heptagyiae. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademeins Handligar, Fjarde Serien 11 (1), 1-472.
2. Craw, R. C. (1989). New Zealand biogeography: A panbiogeographic approach. N. Z. J. Zool. 16, 527-547.
3. Hufford, L., and Dickison, W. D. (1992). A phylogenetic analysis of Cunoniaceae. Syst. Bot. 17, 181-200.
4. Linder, H. P., and Crisp, M. D. (1996). Nothofagus and Pacific biogeography. Cladistics 11, 5-32.
5. Nelson, G., and Ladiges, P. Y. (1991). Three-area statements: Standard assumptions for biogeographic analysis. Syst. Zool. 40, 470-485.
6. Nelson, G., and Ladiges, P. Y. (1993). Missing data and three-item analysis. Cladistics 9, 111-113.
7. Nelson, G., and Ladiges, P. Y. (1995). TAX: MsDos computer programs for systematics. New York and Melbourne: Published by the authors.
8. Nelson, G., and Ladiges, P. Y. (1996). Paralogy in cladistic biogeography and analysis of paralogy-free subtrees. Amer. Mus. Novitates 3167, 58 pp.
9. Page, R. D. M. (1993). COMPONENT Version 2.0. Natural History Museum, London.
10. Platnick, N. I., Griswold, C. E., and Coddington, J. A. (1991). On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7, 337-343.