Measuring support for phylogenies: The "proportional support index"

Cladistics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 173-176

  Lee, Michael S Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000368180     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00258.x     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
2. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
3. Brooks, D. R., O'Grady, R. T., and Wiley, E. O. 1986. A measure of the information content of phylogenetic trees. Syst. Zool. 35, 571-581.
4. Bryant, H. N. 1995. Why autapomorphies should be removed: A reply to Yeates. Cladistics 11, 381-384.
5. Carpenter, J. M. 1988. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics 4: 291-296.
6. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
7. Goloboff, P. A. 1991. Homoplasy and the choice among cladograms. Cladistics 7: 215-232.
8. Källersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8, 275-287.