Eliciting Preferences to Assign Positions and Compensation

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 293-318

  Schummer, James ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000364041     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/game.1999.0718     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abdulkadiroglu A., Sönmez T. Random Serial Dictatorship and the Core from Random Endowments in House Allocation Problems. Econometrica. 66:1998;689-701.
2. Alkan A., Demange G., Gale D. Fair Allocation of Indivisible Objects and Criteria of Justice. Econometrica. 59:1991;1023-1039.
3. Aragones E. A Derivation of the Money Rawlsian Solution. Soc. Choice Welfare. 12:1995;267-276.
4. Barberà S., Peleg B. Strategy-Proof Voting Schemes with Continuous Preferences. Soc Choice Welfare. 7:1990;31-38.
5. Bordes G., Le Breton M. Arrovian Theorems for Economic Domains: Assignments, Matchings, and Pairings. Soc. Choice Welfare. 7:1990;193-208.
6. Clarke E. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice. 8:1971;19-33.
7. Demange G., Gale D. The Strategy Structure of Two-Sided Matching Markets. Econometrica. 53:1985;873-888.
8. Gibbard A. Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result. Econometrica. 41:1973;587-602.
9. Green J., Laffont J.-J. Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanisms for the Revelation of Preferences for Public Goods. Econometrica. 45:1977;427-438.
10. Groves T. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica. 41:1973;617-631.
11. Holmström B. Groves' Scheme on Restricted Domains. Econometrica. 47:1979;1137-1144.
12. Hurwicz L., Walker M. On the Generic Non-Optimality of Dominant Strategy Allocation Mechanisms. Econometrica. 58:1990;683-704.
13. Ma J. Strategy-Proofness and the Strict Core in a Market with Indivisibilities. Int. J. Game Theory. 23:1994;75-83.
14. Maskin E. On the Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods. Feiwel G. Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. 1987;MacMillan, New York.
15. Moulin, H. 1988, Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making, Econometric Society Monograph, Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge Univ. Press.
16. Roth A. Incentive Compatibility in a Market with Indivisible Goods. Econ. Lett. 9:1982;127-132.
17. Satterthwaite M. Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. J. Econ. Theory. 10:1975;187-217.
18. Satterthwaite M., Sonnenschein H. Strategy Proof Allocation Mechanisms at Differentiable Points. Rev. Econ. Stud. 48:1981;587-597.
19. Schummer J. Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency on Restricted Domains of Exchange Economies. Soc. Choice Welfare. 14:1997;47-56.
20. Schummer J. Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency for Small Domains of Preferences over Public Goods. Econ. Theory. 13:1999;709-722.
21. Shapley L., Scarf H. On Cores and Indivisibility. J. Math. Econ. 1:1974;23-37.
22. Svensson L. Large Indivisibles: An Analysis with Respect to Price Equilibrium and Fairness. Econometrica. 51:1983;939-954.
23. Tadenuma K., Thomson W. No-Envy and Consistency in Economies with Indivisible Goods. Econometrica. 59:1991;1755-1767.
24. Tadenuma K., Thomson W. Games Fair Divison. Games Econ. Behavior. 9:1995a;191-204.
25. Tadenuma K., Thomson W. Refinements of the No-Envy Solution in Economies with Indivisible Goods. Theory Decision. 39:1995b;189-206.
26. Zhou L. Impossibility of Strategy-Proof Mechanisms in Economies with Pure Public Goods. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58:1991a;107-119.
27. Zhou L. Inefficiency of Strategy Proof Allocation Mechanisms in Pure Exchange Economies. Soc. Choice Welfare. 8:1991b;247-254.