Perceptual Cues in Pure Alexia

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 941-974

  Sekuler, Erica B ^a   Behrmann, Marlene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alexia; Perception; Perceptual deficit

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000363472     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026432996381746     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Behrmann, M., Black, S.E., & Bub, D. (1990). The evolution of pure alexia: A longitudinal study of recovery. Brain and Language, 39, 405-427.
2. Behrmann, M., & McLeod, J. (1995). Rehabilitation for pure alexia: Efficacy of therapy and implications for models of normal word recognition. Neurophyschological Rehabilitation, 5 (1/2), 149-180.
3. Behrmann, M., & Shallice, T. (1995). Pure alexia: An orthographic not spatial disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12 (4), 409-454.
4. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R., & Mozer, M.C. (submitted). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal subjects and a computational model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Benson, D.F. (1985). Alexia. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 1 (45), 433-455.
6. Black, S.E., & Behrmann, M. (1994). Localisation in alexia. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localisation and neuroimaging in neuropsychology (pp. 331-376). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7. Bub, D., & Arguin, M. (1995). Visual word activation in pure alexia. Brain and Language, 49, 77-103.
8. Bub, D.N., Arguin, M., & Lecours, A.R. (1993). Jules Déjèrine and his interpretation of pure alexia. Brain and Language, 41, 531-559.
9. Bub, D., & Gum, T. (1989). Psychlab software. Montreal: Montreal Neurological Institute.
10. Bub, D.N., & Lewine, J. (1988). Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 33 (1), 161-188.
11. Damasio, A.R., & Damasio, H. (1983). The anatomic basis of pure alexia. Neurology, 33, 1573-1583.
12. Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G.W., & Riddoch, M.J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17 (2), 561-570.
13. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organisation of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
14. Ekstrom, R., French, J.W., & Harman, H.H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15. Farah, M.J. (1991). Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: implications for visual object recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8 (1), 1-19.
16. Farah, M.J. (1992). Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain specificity in visual object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1992, 164-169.
17. Farah, M.J. (1994). Dissociable systems for visual recognition: A cognitive neuropsychology approach. In S.M. Kosslyn & D.N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition (pp. 101-119). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
18. Farah, M.J., & Wallace, M. (1991). Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration. Cognitive Neuropsycholgy, 8 (3/4), 313-334.
19. Farah, M.J., & Wallace, M. (1992). Semantically-bounded anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming. Neuropsychologia, 30 (7), 609-621.
20. Frederiksen, J.R., & Kroll, J.F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to an internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361-379.
21. Friedman, R.B., & Alexander, M.P. (1984). Pictures, images, and pure alexia: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1 (1), 9-25.
22. Friedman, R.B., & Hadley, J.A. (1992). Letter-by-letter surface alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 1-23.
23. Geschwind, N. (1965). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Part 1. Brain, 88, 237-294.
24. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. New York, NY: Lea & Febiger.
25. Greenblatt, S.H. (1973). Alexia without agraphia or hemianopsia: Anatomical analysis of an autopsied case. Brain, 96, 307-316.
26. Hanley, J.R., & Kay, J. (1992). Does letter-by-letter reading involve the spelling system? Neuropsychologia, 30, 237-256.
27. Henderson, V.W., Friedman, R., Teng, E.L., & Weiner, J.M. (1985). Left hemisphere pathways in reading: Inferences from pure alexia without hemianopia. Neurology, 35, 962-968.
28. Howard, D. (1991). Letter-by-letter readers: Evidence for parallel processing. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
29. Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J., Donnelly, N., Freeman, T., Boucart, M., & Müller, H. (1994). Intermediate visual processing and visual agnosia. In M.J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision (pp. 63-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
30. Karanth, P. (1985). Dyslexia in a Dravidian language. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
31. Kay, J., & Hanley, R. (1991). Simultaneous form perception and serial letter recognition in a case of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8 (3/4), 249-273.
32. Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E.K. (1962). A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain, 85, 461-486.
33. Kuçera, H., & Francis, T. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
34. Patterson, K., & Kay, J. (1982). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 411-441.
35. Price, C.J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1992). Letter-by-letter reading? Functional deficits and compensatory strategies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9 (5), 427-457.
36. Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Brunn, J.L. (1990). A prelexical basis for letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 1-20.
37. Rumiati, R.I., Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J., & Bateman, A. (1994). Visual object agnosia without prosopagnosia or alexia: Evidence for hierarchical theories of visual recognition. Visual Cognition, 1, 181-225.
38. Seidenberg, M., Waters, G., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and post-lexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12, 315-328.
39. Sekuler, A.B. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: Effects of symmetry and orientation. Perception, 23, 529-545.
40. Sekuler, A.B., & Palmer, S.E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121 (1), 95-111.
41. Sekuler, A.B., Palmer, S.E., & Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260-267.
42. Shallice, T., & Saffran, E. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 429-458.
43. Shallice, T., Warrington, E.K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 111-138.
44. Snodgrass, S.G., & Vanderwart, M.A. (1980). A standardised set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 174-215.
45. Warrington, E.K., & Rabin, P. (1971). Visual span apprehension in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 423-431.
46. Warrington, E.K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99-112.