Phase diagram for the spin pseudogap studied by NMR

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 55, Issue 18, 1997, Pages 12736-12741

  Goto, Atsushi ^a   Yasuoka, Hiroshi ^a   Otzschi, Kenji ^a   Ueda, Yutaka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000360272     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.12736     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
2. Y. Suzumura, Y. Hasegawa and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 2768 (1988).
3. T. Tanamoto, K. Kuboki and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.ibid. 60, 3072 (1991), and references therein.
4. A. J. Millis, L. B. Ioffe, and H. Monien (unpublished).
5. A. J. Millis and H. Monien (unpublished). (This theory does not postulate the FL picture.)
6. K. Miyake and O. Narikiyo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 3821 (1994).
7. W. W. Warren, Jr., R. E. Walstedt, G. F. Brennertd, R. J. Cava, R. Tycho, R. E. Bell and G. Dabbagh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1193 (1989).
8. T. Imai, T. Shimizu, H. Yasuoka, Y. Ueda, K. Yoshimura and K. Kosuge, Physica C 162-164, 169 (1989).
9. A. Goto, H. Yasuoka and Y. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3043 (1996).
10. Actually, there was a report that (Formula presented)(Formula presented)(Formula presented) with y>6.94 may be in the heavily doped region [C. Berthier, J. A. Gillet, T. G. Auler, Y. Berthier, M. Horvatic, P. Segransan and J. Y. Henry, Phys. Scr. 49, 131 (1993)] but no substantial decrease of (Formula presented) is observed (∼92 K) up to y=6.98 in our samples [Ref. 10]. Hence, one may substantially be allowed to consider the compound with y=6.98 as an optimally doped sample.
11. M. Matsumura, Y. Sakamoto, T. Fushihara, Y. Itoh and H. Yamagata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 721 (1995).
12. A. P. Reyes, D. E. MacLaughlin, M. Takigawa, P. C. Hammel, R. H. Heffner, J. D. Thompson and J. E. Crow, Phys. Rev. B 43, 2989 (1991). (In this case, since a valence of substituted Pr ions is controversial, it is not clear whether the Pr doping results in change in the hole concentration.)
13. K. Otzschi, A. Hayashi and Y. Ueda, Physica C 235-240, 839 (1994);K. Otzschi, A. Hayashi, Y. Ueda, A. Goto, and H. Yasuoka (unpublished).
14. T. Tsuda (private communication).
15. H. Yasuoka, T. Shimizu, T. Imai, S. Sasaki, Y. Ueda and K. Kosuge, Hyperfine Interact. 49, 167 (1989).
16. T. Moriya, in Spectroscopy of Mott Insulators and Correlated metals, edited by A. Fujimori and Y. Tokura (Springer, Berlin, 1995) p. 66.
17. C. H. Pennington, D. J. Durand, C. P. Slichter, J. R. Rice, E. D. Bukwski and D. M. Ginsberg, Phys. Rev. B 39, 274 (1989).
18. Y. Itoh, H. Yasuoka, Y. Fujiwara, Y. Ueda, T. Machi, I. Tomeno, K. Tai, N. Koshizuka and S. Tanaka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 1287 (1992).
19. Y. Itoh and H. Yasuoka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 2518 (1994).
20. A. Sokol and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2813 (1993).
21. T. Moriya, Y. Takahashi and K. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59, 2905 (1990).
22. A. J. Millis, H. Monien and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. B 42, 167 (1990).
23. T. Tanamoto, H. Kohno and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 2739 (1994).
24. N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2450 (1990).
25. M. U. Ubbens and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 50, 438 (1994).
26. A. Goto (unpublished).