Power plant flue gas as a source of CO2 for microalgae cultivation: Economic impact of different process options

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 38, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages

  Kadam, Kiran L ^a  

^a NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

CO2 mitigation; Economic analysis; Flue gas; Lipid production; Microalgae cultivation; Monoethanolamine (MEA) process; Power plant

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000354706     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(96)00318-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. 2 Supply for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Final Report: DOE/MC/08333-3 (DE82004814).
2. Energy Information Administration. (1994a). US DOE (Dept. of Energy) publication: Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Utility Plants 1993, Washington, DC.
3. Energy Information Administration. (1994b). US DOE (Dept. of Energy) publication: Coal Industry Annual 1993, Washington, DC.
4. Hare, M., H. Perlich, R. Robinson, M. Shah and F. Zimmerman (1978). Sources and Recovery of Carbon Dioxide for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Final Report: FE-2515-24.
5. Herzog, H., E. Drake and J. Tester (1993). A Research Needs Assessment for the Capture, Utilization and Disposal of Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants, Report for DOE (Dept. of Energy) Grant No. DE-FG02-92ER30194.A000.
6. th Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. Ann. Mtg. & Exhibi., Cincinnati, Ohio.
7. 2 from power plant flue gas: a technoeconomic perspective. World Resource Review, 8(4), 493-504.
8. rd ed., Gulf Publishing Co., Houston.
9. Maddox, R. N. (1977). Gas and Liquid Sweetening, John M. Campbell (Campbell Petroleum Series), Norman, Oklahoma.
10. 2 problem. Climatic Change, 1, 59-68.
11. True, W.R. (1994). Pipeline economics report. Oil & Gas J., 92(47), 41-58.