Surveillance, knowledge and risk: The embodied experience of cervical screening

Health

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 195-215

  Howson, Alexandra ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical screening; Gender; Governance; Prevention; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000353084     PISSN: 13634593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136345939800200205     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Allsop, J. and Freeman, R. (1993). Prevention in health policy in the United Kingdom and the NHS, pp. 18-39. In M. Mills (Ed.), Prevention, health and British politics. Aldershot: Avebury.
2. Anderson, C. (1987). Premalignant and malignant disease of the cervix. In H. Fox (Ed.), Haines and Taylor obstetrical and gynaecological pathology, 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
3. Armstrong, D. (1983). The political anatomy of the body. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Armstrong, D. (1993). Public health spaces and the fabrication of identity. Sociology, 27(3), 393-410.
5. Armstrong, D. (1995). The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness, 17(3), 393-404
6. Arney, W.R. (1982). Power and the profession of obstetrics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
7. Arney, W.R. and Bergen, B.J. (1984). Medicine and the management of living. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
8. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
9. Bell, S.E. (1988). Becoming a political woman: The reconstruction and interpretation of experience through stories. In A.D. Todd and S. Fisher (Eds.), Gender and discourse: The power of talk, pp. 97-123. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Beral, V. (1974). Cancer of the cervix: A sexually transmitted infection. Lancet, i, 1037-40.
11. Bloor, M., Barnard, M., Finlay, A. and McKeganey, N. (1993). HIV-related risk practices among Glasgow prostitutes: Reframing concepts of risk behaviour. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 7, 1-9.
12. Bordo, S. (1989). The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist appropriation of Foucault. In A. Jaggar and S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge, pp. 13-28. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
13. Boyes, D.A., Fidler, H.K. and Lock, D.R. (1961). Significance of in situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix. British Medical Journal, i, 203-5.
14. British Medical Association (1986). Cervical cancer and screening in Great Britain. London: British Medical Association.
15. Bunton, R. (1992). More than a woolly jumper: Health promotion as social regulation. Critical Social Policy, 3(2), 4-11.
16. Bunton, R. and Burrows, R. (1995). Consumption and health in the late 'epidemiological' clinic of late modern medicine. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton and R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion. London: Routledge.
17. Burrows, R., Nettleton, S. and Bunton, R. (1995). Sociology and health promotion: Health, risk and consumption under late modernism. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton and R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion, pp. 1-12. London: Routledge.
18. Bury, J. (1994). Women and HIV/AIDS: medical issues. In L. Doyal, J. Naidoo and T. Wilton (Eds.), AIDS: Setting a feminist agenda, pp. 30-41. London: Taylor & Francis.
19. Calnan, M. and Williams, S. (1996). Lay evaluation of scientific medicine and medical care. In S. Williams and M. Calnan (Eds.), Modern medicine: Lay perspectives and experiences, pp. 26-47. London: University College London Press.
20. Carter, S. (1995). Boundaries of danger and uncertainty: An analysis of the technological culture of risk assessment. In J. Gabe (Ed.), Medicine, health and risk, pp. 133-50. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Castel, R. (1991). From dangerousness to risk. In G. Durchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, pp. 281-98. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. Chamberlain, G. (1981). The aetiology of gynaecological cancer. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 74, 246.
23. Clarke, A. and Caspar, M. (1996). From simple technology to complex arena: Classification of Pap smears, 1917-1990. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 10(4), 601-23.
24. Crawford, R. (1979). Individual responsibility and health politics in the 1970s. In S. Reveroy and D. Rosner (Eds.), Health care in America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25. Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalisation of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365-83.
26. Daly, J. (1989). Innocent murmurs: Echocardiography and the diagnosis of cardiac normality. Sociology of Health and Illness, 11(2), 99-116.
27. Davies, C. (1984). General practitioners and the pull of prevention. Sociology of Health and Illness, 6(3), 267-89.
28. Davidson, R. (1993). Measuring the 'social evil': The incidence of venereal disease in interwar Scotland. Medical History, 37, 167-86.
29. Denzin, N. (1988). Interpretive interactionisin. London: Sage.
30. Department of Health (1989). General practice in the National Health Service: The 1990 contract. London: HMSO.
31. Department of Health and Social Security (1976). Prevention and health: Everybody's business. London: HMSO.
32. de Swaan, A. (1990). The management of normality. London: Routledge.
33. Douglas, M. and Calvez, M. (1990). The self as risk taker: A cultural theory of contagion in relation to AIDS. Sociological Review, 38(3), 445-64.
34. Doyle, Y. (1991). A survey of the cervical screening service in a London district, including reasons for non-attendance, ethnic responses and views on the quality of service. Social Science and Medicine, 32(8), 953-7.
35. Draper, G.J. and Cook, G.A. (1983). Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates. British Medical Journal 287, 510-12.
36. Ehrenreich, B. and English, D. (1979). For her own good: 150 years of experts' advice to women. London: Pluto Press.
37. Elkind, A.K., Haran, D., Eardley, A. and Spencer, B. (1988). Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: Pilot interviews. Social Science and Medicine, 27(6), 651-60.
38. Ellman, R. and Chamberlain, J. (1984). Improving the effectiveness of cervical screening. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 34, 537-42.
39. Foucault, M. (1988). [1986] The history of sexuality: the care of the self. Vol. 3. New York: Vintage Books.
40. Freeman, R. (1992). The idea of prevention: A critical review. In S. Scott, G. Williams, S. Platt and H. Thomas (Eds.), Private risks and public dangers, pp. 33-49. Aldershot: Avebury.
41. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
43. Gifford, S.M. (1986). The meaning of lumps: A case study of the ambiguities of risk. In C.R. Janes, R. Stall and S.M. Gifford (Eds.), Anthropology and epidemiology: Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of health and disease, pp. 213-48. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
44. Graham, H. (1979). Prevention and health: Every mother's business. In C. Harris (Ed.), The Sociology of the family: new directions for Britain. Keele: University of Keele, Sociological Review Monograph.
45. Greco, M. (1993). Psychosomatic subjects and the 'duty to be well': Personal agency within medical rationality. Economy and Society, 22(3), 357-72.
46. Hakama, M. (1982). Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries. In K. Magnus (Ed.), Trends in cancer: Causes and practical implications. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
47. Hastie, S., Porch, S. and Brown, L. (1995). Doing it ourselves: Promoting women's health as feminist action. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Feminist activism in the 1990s. London: Taylor & Francis.
48. Hawkes, G. (1995). Responsibility and irresponsibility: Young women and family planning. Sociology, 29(2), 257-74.
49. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Scott, S. and Thomson, R. (1994). Desire, risk and control: The body as a site of contestation. In L. Doyal, T. Wilton and Naidoo, J. (Eds.), AIDS: Setting a feminist agenda, pp. 61-79. London: Taylor & Francis.
50. Hopwood, J. (no date). Background to cervical cytology reports. West Sussex: Schering Health Care.
51. Howson, A. (1995). The female body and health surveillance: Cervical screening and the social production of risk. Edinburgh Working Papers in Sociology No. 2, November.
52. Howson, A. (1996). Sisterhood is cervical: A sociology of the body, gender and health. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
53. Howson, A. (1998). Embodied obligation: The female body and health surveillance. In S. Nettleton and J. Watson (Eds.), The body in everyday life. London: Routledge (in press).
54. Husain, O.A.N. (1987). Women's cancer: Positive action. London: Royal Society of Medicine/Women's Nationwide Cancer Control Campaign.
55. Johnstone, K. (1989). Screening for cervical cancer: A review of the literature. Discussion Paper 4/89, Health Economics Unit, University of Aberdeen.
56. Lane, K. (1995). The medical model of the body as a site of risk: A case study of childbirth. In J. Gabe (Ed.) Medicine, health and risk, pp. 53-72. Oxford: Blackwell.
57. Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk: A sociological theory. Berlin & New York: W. de Gruyter.
58. Luker, K. (1975). Taking chances, abortion and the decision not to contracept. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Lupton, D. (1993). Risk as moral danger: The social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. The International Journal of Health Services, 23(3), 425-35.
60. Lupton, D. (1995). The imperative of health. London: Sage.
61. Lupton, D. (1997). Foucault and the medicalisation critique. In A. Petersen and R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine, pp. 94-112. London: Routledge.
62. McGoogan, E. (1993). Report of the inquiry into cervical cytopathology at Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock. Edinburgh: HMSO.
63. MacGregor, J.E., Moss, S. M., Parkin, D. M. and Day, N.E. (1985). Case control study of cervical cancer screening in North East Scotland. British Medical Journal, 290, 1543-6.
64. McKay, K. and Wallace, A.M. (1991). A Report of a survey of cervical screening in general practice in Lothian. Edinburgh: Department of Public Health Medicine.
65. McKeown, T. (1968). Validation of screening procedures. In T. McKeown (Ed.), Screening in health care. London: Oxford University Press.
66. McKie, L. (1993). Women's views of the cervical smear test: Implications for nursing practice - women who have had a smear test. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1228-34.
67. McKie, L. (1995). The art of surveillance or reasonable prevention? The case of cervical screening. Sociology of Health and Illness, 17(4), 441-57.
68. Murcott, A. (1979). Health as ideology. In P. Atkinson, R. Dingwall and A. Murcott (Eds.), Prospects for the National Health. London: Croom Helm.
69. Nettleton, S. (1991). Wisdom, diligence and teeth; discursive practices and the creation of mothers. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(1), 98-111.
70. Nettleton, S. (1992). Power, pain and dentistry. Buckingham: Open University Press.
71. Nettleton, S. and Bunton, R. (1995). Sociological critiques of health promotion. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton and R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion, pp. 41-59. London: Routledge.
72. Nicoll, P.M., Narayan, K.V. and Paterson, J.G. (1991). Cervical cancer screening: Women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences. Health Bulletin, 49/3.
73. Ogden, J. (1995). Psychological theory and the creation of the risky self. Social Science and Medicine, 40(3), 409-15.
74. Parsons, E. and Atkinson, P. (1992). Lay constructions of genetic risk. Sociology of Health and Illness, 14(4), 437-55.
75. Paterson, M.E.L., Peel, K.R. and Joslin, C.A.F. (1982). Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cancer in Yorkshire. British Medical Journal, 289, 896-8.
76. Petersen, A. (1997). Risk, governance and the new public health. In A. Petersen and R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine. London: Routledge.
77. Phillips, A. and Rakussen, J. (1971). Our bodies ourselves: A health book by and for women. Harmondsworth: Penguin (British edition).
78. Pill, R. and Stott, N.C.H. (1982). Concepts of illness causation and responsibility: Some preliminary data from a sample of working class mothers. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 381-92.
79. Posner, T. (1991). What's in a smear? Cervical screening, medical signs and metaphors. Science as Culture, 2, part 2(1), 167-87.
80. Posner, T. and Vessey, M. (1988). The patient's view. London: The King's Fund.
81. Priden, H. and Lilienfield, A.M. (1971). Carcinoma of the cervix in Jewish women in Israel 1960-7. Israel. J. Med. Sci, 7, 1765 (cited in Robinson, 1982).
82. Raffle, A.E., Alden, B. and MacKenzie, E.F.D. (1995). Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: What are we screening for? Lancet 345, 1469-73.
83. Richardson, D. (1994). AIDS: Issues for feminism in the UK. In L. Doyal, T. Wilton and J. Naidoo (Eds.), AIDS: Setting a feminist agenda, pp. 42-60. London: Taylor & Francis.
84. Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Sage.
85. Robinson, J. (1982). Cancer of the cervix: Occupational risk of husbands and wives and possible preventive strategies in pre-clinical neo-plasia of the cervix. In J.A. Jordan, F. Sharp, and A. Singer (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth study group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
86. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
87. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1987). Report of the intercollegiate working party on cervical cytology screening. London: Progress Press Ltd.
88. Ruzek, S. (1978). The women's health movement: Feminist alternatives to medical control. New York: Praeger Books.
89. Savage, W. and McPherson, A. (1983). Cervical Cytology. In A. McPherson and A. Anderson (Eds.), Women's problems in general practice, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. Schwartz, M., Savage, W., George, J. and Emohare, L. (1989). Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: A failure of health education and medical organisation. Community Medicine, 11, 279-89.
91. Singer, A., Reid, B., and Coppleson, M. (1976). A hypothesis: The role of the high risk male in the etiology of cervical carcinoma. American Journal of Obsterics and Gynaecology, 126, 110 (cited in Robinson, 1982).
92. Singer, L. (1994). Erotic welfare: Sexual theory and politics in the age of epidemic. London: Routledge.
93. Singleton, V. (1995). Networking constructions of gender and constructing gender networks: Considering definitions of woman in the British Cervical Screening Programme. In K. Grint and R. Gill (Eds.), The gender-technology relation. London: Taylor & Francis.
94. Stone, D. (1986). The resistible rise of preventive medicine. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 11(4), 671-96.
95. Taylor, R. (1982). The politics of prevention. Social policy, Summer, 32-41.
96. Turner, B.S. (1995). Medical power and social knowledge, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
97. Turner, B.S. (1996). The body and society, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
98. Vecchia, La. C., Franchesi, S., DeCarli, A., Fasoli, M., Gentile, A., Parazzini, F. and Regallo, M. (1986) Sexual factors, venereal diseases and the risk of intraepithelial and invasive cervical neoplasia. Cancer, 58, 935-41.
99. Wigle, D.T., Mao, Y. and Grace, M. (1980). Smoking and cancer of the uterine cervix: Hypothesis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 111, 125.
100. Wilkinson, S., Jones, J.M. and McBride, J. (1990). Anxiety caused by abnormal result of a cervical smear test: A controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 300, 440.