메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1987, Pages 167-187

Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials - The Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defense Attorney's Fallacy

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0000312731     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: 1573661X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01044641     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (286)

References (54)
  • 1
    • 84934678865 scopus 로고
    • Admissibility, weight and sufficiency of blood grouping tests in criminal cases
    • Annotation
    • (1980) American Law Reports, Fourth , vol.2 , pp. 500
  • 5
    • 84984238409 scopus 로고
    • Quantitative analysis and the law: Probability theory as a tool of evidence in criminal trials
    • (1982) Utah Law Review , vol.4 , pp. 41-87
    • Braun, L.J.1
  • 11
    • 0345266375 scopus 로고
    • Identification by probabilities and trial by mathematics (a lesson for beginners in how to be wrong with greater precision)
    • (1979) Houston Law Review , vol.6 , pp. 471-518
    • Cullison, A.D.1
  • 23
    • 84934676643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Giannelli, P. C. (1983). Frye v. U.S. Background paper prepared for the national conference of lawyers and scientists, Symposium of Science and the Rules of Evidence. National Conference of Lawyers & Scientists, April 29–30.
  • 37
    • 84934676654 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Note (1983). Admissibility of mathematical evidence in criminal trials. American Criminal Law Review, 21, 55–79.
  • 46
    • 52849104930 scopus 로고
    • The behavioral richness of cascaded inference models: Examples in jurisprudence
    • Pisoni, Castellan, Potts, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey
    • (1977) Cognitive theory
    • Schum, D.A.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.