SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

9
- 84927346753
- D.L. Lichtenberger, M.E. Jatcko, K.W. Nebensy, C.D. Ray, D.R. Huffman, and L.D. Lamb, in Clusters and Cluster Assembled Materials, edited by R. S. Averback, J. Bernholc, and D. L. Nelson, MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 206 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1991), p. 673; P. Baltzer, W.J. Griffiths, A.J. Maxwell, P.A. Bruhwiler, L. Karlsson, and N. Mårtensson (unpublished).

12
- 84927346751
- The coupling constants differ slightly from the ones in Ref. 9. For λν/N(0) we have used 0.021, 0.038, 0.012, 0.016, 0.012, 0.000, 0.020, 0.022 for the eight Hg modes, with the first number referring to the lowest mode. Here λν is the coupling entering in superconductivity and N(0) is the density of states per spin and eV. The corresponding numbers used in Ref. 9 were 0.019, 0.040, 0.013, 0.018, 0.012, 0.005, 0.017, 0.023. The couplings to the Ag modes are the same as in Ref. 9 bbox(0.000 [Asub g(1)] and 0.011 [Ag(2)] bbox).

16
- 84927346750
- This is how the Hg modes were replaced by Ag modes in Refs. 4 and 8.

17
- 0001980554
- This method for treating the Jahn Teller effect has been extensively used by, edited by, I. Prigogine, S.A. Rice, Wiley, New York
- (1984) Advanced Chemical Physics , vol.57 , pp. 59
- Köppel, H.¹ Domcke, W.² Cederbaum, L.S.³

18
- 84927346749
- This size is obtained using seven Hg modes, since we have here assumed the coupling to the sixth mode to be zero.

19
- 84927346748
- In Ref. 12 an incorrect coefficient was given for n=3. This led to a positive Ag contribution to U for n=3, while it should be negative and independent of n.

23
- 84927346747
- Observe that the strong coupling limit here refers to sumν=18 (gν/ων)2 gg 1, and not to λ gg 1 as in the superconductivity theory.

24
- 84956207464
- Theory of Nonadiabatic Superconductivity
- (1992) Europhysics Letters (EPL) , vol.18 , pp. 627
- Pietronero, L.¹ Strässler, S.²

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.