Electron transfer model for the electric field effect on quantum yield of charge separation in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 101, Issue 25, 1997, Pages 5031-5045

  Tanaka, Shigenori ^a,b   Marcus, R A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b TOSHIBA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000295825     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp9632854     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Haberkorn, R.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E.; Marcus, R. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76, 4185.
2. Deisenhofer, J.; Epp, O.; Miki, K.; Huber, R.; Michel, H. J. Mol. Biol. 1984, 180, 385.
3. Deisenhofer, J.; Epp, O.; Miki, K.; Huber, R.; Michel, H. Nature 1985, 318, 618.
4. Michel, H.; Epp, O.; Deisenhofer, J. EMBO J. 1986, 5, 2445.
5. Chang, C.-H.; Tiede, D.; Tang, J.; Smith, U.; Norris, J.; Schiffer, M. FEBS Lett. 1986, 205, 82.
6. Allen, J. P.; Feher, G.; Yeates, T. O.; Komiya, H.; Rees, D. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987, 84, 5730.
7. Ermler, U.; Fritzsch, G.; Buchanan, S. K.; Michel, H. Structure 1994, 2, 925.
8. Woodbury, N. W.; Becker, M.; Middendorf, D.; Parson, W. W. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 7516.
9. Martin, J.-L.; Breton, J.; Hoff, A. J.; Migus, A.; Antonetti, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83, 957.
10. Breton, J.; Martin, J.-L.; Migus, A.; Antonetti, A.; Orszag, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986, 83, 5121.
11. Fleming, G. R.; Martin, J. L.; Breton, J. Nature 1988, 333, 190.
12. Kirmaier, C.; Holten, D. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 3552.
13. Holzapfel, W.; Finkele, U.; Kaiser, W.; Oesterhelt, D.; Scheer, H.; Stilz, H. U.; Zinth, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 5168.
14. Vos, M. H.; Lambry, J.-C.; Robles, S. J.; Youvan, D. C.; Breton, J.; Martin, J.-L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88, 8885.
15. Du, M.; Rosenthal, S. J.; Xie, X.; DiMagno, T. J.; Schmidt, M.; Hanson, D. K.; Schiffer, M.; Norris, J. R.; Fleming, G. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 8517.
16. Nagarajan, V.; Parson, W. W.; Davis, D.; Schenck, C. C. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 12324.
17. Schmidt, S.; Arlt, T.; Hamm, P.; Huber, H.; Nägele, T.; Wachtveitl, J.; Meyer, M.; Scheer, H.; Zinth, W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 223, 116.
18. Marcus, R. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 133, 471.
19. Marcus, R. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 146, 13.
20. Michel-Beyerle, M. E.; Plato, M.; Deisenhofer, J.; Michel, H.; Bixon, M.; Jortner, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1988, 932, 52.
21. Bixon, M.; Jortner, J.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E. Chem. Phys. 1995, 197, 389.
22. Popovic, Z. D.; Kovacs, G. J.; Vincett, P. S.; Alegria, G.; Dutton, P. L. Biochim. Biophvs. Acta 1986, 851, 38.
23. Moser, C. C.; Sension, R. J.; Szarka, A. Z.; Repinec, S. T.; Hochstrasser, R. M.; Dutton, P. L. Chem. Phys. 1995, 197, 343.
24. Ogrodnik, A.; Langenbacher, T.; Bieser, G.; Siegl, J.; Eberl, U.; Volk, M.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 198, 653.
25. Lao, K.; Franzen, S.; Stanley, R. J.; Lambright, D. G.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13165.
26. Lao, K.; Franzen, S.; Steffen, M.; Lambright, D.; Stanley, R.; Boxer, S. G. Chem. Phys. 1995, 197, 259.
27. Lockhart, D. J.; Boxer, S. G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 144, 243.
28. Lockhart, D. J.; Goldstein, R. F.; Boxer, S. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 1408.
29. Lockhart, D. J.; Kirmaier, C.; Holten, D.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6987.
30. Ogrodnik, A.; Eberl, U.; Heckmann, R.; Kappl, M.; Feick, R.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2036.
31. Ogrodnik, A. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1993, 230, 35.
32. Franzen, S.; Goldstein, R. F.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5135.
33. Franzen, S.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 6304.
34. Bixon, M.; Jortner, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 7148.
35. Ogrodnik, A.; Keupp, W.; Volk, M.; Aumeier, G.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 3432.
36. Sumi, H.; Kakitani, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 252, 85; also unpublished work.
37. Breton, J.; Martin, J.-L.; Lambry, J.-C; Robles, S. J.; Youvan, D. C. In Reaction Centers of Photosynthetic Bacteria; Michel-Beyerle, M. E., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1990; p 293.
38. Eberl, U.; Gilbert, M.; Keupp, W.; Langenbacher, T.; Siegl, J.; Sinning, I.; Ogrodnik, A.; Robles, S. J.; Breton, J.; Youvan, D. C.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E. In The Photosynthetic Bacterial Reaction Center, Breton, J., Verméglio, A., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1992; Vol. II, p 253.
39. Ogrodnik, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1020, 65.
40. Goldstein, R. A.; Takiff, L.; Boxer, S. G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1988, 934, 253.
41. Woodbury, N. W.; Parson, W. W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1984, 767, 345.
42. Gunner, M. R.; Dutton, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3400.
43. Scherer, P. O. J.; Fischer, S. F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 131, 153.
44. Boxer, S. G.; Goldstein, R. A.; Lockhart, D. J.; Middendorf, T. R.; Takiff, L. J Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 8280.
45. Middendorf, T. R.; Mazzola, L. T.; Lao, K.; Steffen, M. A.; Boxer, S. G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1143, 223.
46. Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265.
47. Jortner, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 4860.
48. -1.
49. ij (cf. section 2.2 and appendix A).
50. -H survives for a much longer time in the presence of the favorable electric field there.
51. Song, X.; Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 7768.
52. Zankel, K. L.; Reed, D. W.; Clayton, R. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1968, 61, 1243.
53. ext = 0.7 and 1.0 MV/cm, respectively.
54. Osváth, S.; Laczkó, G.; Sebban, P.; Maróti, P. Photosynth. Res. 1996, 47, 41.
55. The good agreement of the calculated results between the simplified model and the full kinetic model, shown in the following, does not depend on this choice for the value of α. As will be shown in Figure 11, eq 2.8 reproduces the numerical results well also in the absence of any heterogeneity.
56. ext = 0)|, in spite of the pertinent ET reaction being in the inverted region (cf. section 3.1). This behavior, which perhaps is at first glance surprising, is due to the fact that the charge-separation quantum yield primarily depends not on the forward ET rate constant but on the detailed balance relation, eq 2.18, between the forward and backward ET rates, as suggested by eqs 2.6-2.8.
57. 23, as seen in eqs 2.6-2.8.
58. 42
59. Englman, R.; Jortner, J. Mol. Phys. 1970, 18, 145.
60. Lockhart, D. J.; Hammes, S. L.; Franzen, S.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2217.
61. nr = 1.002.
62. Sumi, H. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 49, 1701.
63. Newton, M. D. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 767.
64. Marcus, R. A.; Almeida, R. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 2973.
65. Almeida, R.; Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 2978.