Educational standards and students with disabilities

Educational Forum

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 220-229

  Geenen, Kristin ^a   Ysseldyke, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000294741     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131729709335259     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allington, R. L., and A. McGill-Franzen. 1992. Unintended effects of educational reform in New York. Educational Policy 6(4): 397-414.
2. Bond, L. A., A. Van der Ploeg, D. Braskand, and E. D. Roeber. 1995. State student assessment program database. Oak Brook, 111.: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
3. Coutinho, M., and D. Malouf. 1993. Performance assessment and children with disabilities: Issues and possibilities. Teaching Exceptional Children 25(4): 63-67.
4. David, J. L., and P. D. Goren. 1993. Transforming education: Overcoming barriers. Washington, D.C.: National Governors' Association.
5. Fullan, M. 1992. Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
6. Geenen, K., D. Scott, R. Schaefer, M. Thurlow, and J. Ysseldyke. 1995. Synthesis report update 1994: Reports on the status of education, desired outcomes, and reform initiatives. Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes.
7. Geenen, K., M. Thurlow, and J. Ysseldyke. 1995. A disability perspective on five years of educational reform. Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes.
8. Hanley, T. 1994. The need for technological advances in assessment related to National Educational Reform. Exceptional Children 61(3): 222-29.
9. Kaufman, P., D. Bradby, and J. Owings. 1992. Characteristics of at-risk students in NELS:88. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
10. Monk, D. 1992. Education productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14(4): 307-32.
11. National Center on Educational Outcomes. 1996.1995 state special education outcomes. Minneapolis: NCEO.
12. National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Resnick, L. B. L., K. J. Nolan, and D. P. Resnick. 1995. Benchmarking education standards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17(4): 438-61.
14. Shriner, J., J. Ysseldyke, and M. Thurlow. 1994. Standards for all American students. Focus on Exceptional Children 26(5): 1-19.
15. Thurlow, M., D. Scott, and J. Ysseldyke. 1995a. A compilation of states' guidelines for including students with disabilities in assessments (Synthesis Report 17). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes.
16. Thurlow, M., D. Scott, and J. Ysseldyke. 1995b. A compilation of states' guidelines for accommodations in assessments for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 18). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes.
17. U.S. Department of Education. 1994. To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities; Sixteenth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, D.C.: USDE.
18. Ysseldyke, J., M. C. Reynolds, and R. Weinberg. 1984. School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice. Minneapolis: National School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
19. Ysseldyke, J., and K. Geenen. 1996. Integrating the special education and compensatory education systems into the school reform process: A national perspective. School Psychology Review 25(4): 41830.
20. Ysseldyke, J., M. Thurlow, and K. Geenen. 1994a. Future directions in theeducational outcomes of students with disabilities. Special Services in the Schools 9(2): 193-208.
21. Ysseldyke, J., M. Thurlow, and K. Geenen. 1994b. Implementation of alternative methods for making educational accountability decisions for students with disabilities. Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes.