Reorientations in supercooled glycerol studied by two-dimensional time-domain deuteron nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 241-248

  Bohmer R ^a   Hinze, G ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000293097     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.476557     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. For example, F. E. Simon and F. Lange, Z. Phys. 38, 227 (1926);
2. K. S. Cole and R. H. Cole, J. Chem. Phys. 9, 341 (1941).
3. A. Barkatt and C. A. Angell, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 901 (1979).
4. N. O. Birge, Y. H. Jeong, and S. R. Nagel, Ann. (N.Y.) Acad. Sci. 484, 101 (1986).
5. Y.-X. Yan, L. T. Cheng, and K. A. Nelson, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 6477 (1988).
6. C. A. Herbst, R. L. Cook, and H. E. King, Jr., Nature (London) 361, 518 (1993).
7. T. Christensen and N. B. Olsen, Phys. Rev. B 49, 15396 (1994).
8. B. Schiener, R. Böhmer, A. Loidl, and R. V. Chamberlin, Science 274, 752 (1996).
9. N. Menon, K. P. O'Brien, P. K. Dixon, L. Wu, S. R. Nagel, B. D. Williams, and J. P. Carini, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 141, 61 (1992);
10. P. Lunkenheimer, A. Pimenov, M. Dressel, Yu. G. Goncharov, R. Böhmer, and A. Loidl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 318 (1996).
11. R. Böhmer, K. L. Ngai, C. A. Angell, and D. J. Plazek, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4201 (1993).
12. L. J. Root and F. H. Stillinger, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1200 (1989).
13. T. Franosch, W. Götze, M. R. Mayr, and A. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. E 55, 3183 (1997).
14. J. Wuttke, J. Hernandez, G. Li, G. Coddens, H. Z. Cummins, F. Fujara, W. Petry, and H. Sillescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3052 (1994).
15. For an extensive list of references see J. Wuttke, W. Petry, and S. Pouget, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 5177 (1996).
16. W. Götze, in Liquids, Freezing, and the Glass Transition, edited by J. P. Hansen, D. Levesque, and J. Zinn-Justin (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991), Part I, p. 287.
17. M. Wolfe and J. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 3252 (1979).
18. P. L. Kuhns and M. S. Conradi, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 1771 (1982).
19. T. Gullion and M. S. Conradi, Phys. Rev. B 32, 7076 (1985).
20. F. Fujara, S. Wefing, and H. W. Spiess, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 4579 (1986).
21. E. Rössler, Chem. Phys. Lett. 128, 330 (1986).
22. R. M. Diehl, F. Fujara, and H. Sillescu, Europhys. Lett. 13, 257 (1990);
23. R. M. Diehl, Dissertation, Mainz, 1991;
24. R. M. Diehl, Diplomarbeit, Mainz, 1987.
25. B. Geil, F. Fujara, and H. Sillescu, J. Magn. Reson. 130, 18 (1998);
26. I. Chang, F. Fujara, B. Geil, G. Heuberger, T. Mangel, and H. Sillescu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 172-174, 248 (1994);
27. B. Geil, Dissertation, Mainz, 1993.
28. G. Hinze, Phys. Rev. E 57, 2010 (1998).
29. K. Schmidt-Rohr and H. W. Spiess, Multidimensional Solid State NMR and Polymers (Academic, London, 1994).
30. p, so that essentially all the dynamics takes place during t. This simplifies the analysis of the experiment but does not constitute a principal constraint for the choice of experimental parameters.
31. G. Hinze, R. Böhmer, G. Diezemann, and H. Sillescu, J. Magn. Reson. 131, 218 (1998).
32. M. Bée, Quasielastic Neutron Scattering (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1988).
33. J. E. Anderson, Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc. 6, 82 (1972).
34. E. N. Ivanov, Sov. Phys. JETP 18, 1041 (1964) [J. Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 45, 1509 (1963)].
35. Due to the axial symmetry of the relevant electrical field gradient tensor the azimuthal angle needed not to be taken into account explicitly.
36. We have used the random number generator ran4, see W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).
37. i+1) is found on the surface of a cone located around the initial orientation. With a jump angle the cone exhibits an opening angle of 2. The variable 0≤ζ<2π specifies where, on the circle obtained from the intersection of this cone with the unit sphere, the C-D orientation vector is pointing to after the elementary jump.
38. SIN signals the latter were multiplied by 4 3 (see Refs. 23 and 25).
39. For details see, e.g., Refs. 23 and 25.
40. T. Jörg et al. (unpublished).
41. S. Vega and A. Pines, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 5624 (1977);
42. N. A. Sergeev, Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 10, 45 (1997).
43. This is what should be expected in the slow motion regime; see A. Müller, H. Zimmermann, and U. Haeberlen, J. Magn. Reson. 126, 66 (1997);
44. also see F. Fujara, B. Geil, H. Sillescu, and G. Fleischer, Z. Phys. B 88, 195 (1992).
45. P. Lunkenheimer, A. Pimenov, B. Schiener, R. Böhmer, and A. Loidl, Europhys. Lett. 33, 611 (1996).
46. G. Diezemann, H. Sillescu, G. Hinze, and R. Böhmer, Phys. Rev. E 57, 4398 (1998).
47. G. Diezemann, R. Böhmer, G. Hinze, and H. Sillescu, J. Non-Cryst. Solids (in press).
48. R. Böhmer, G. Hinze, G. Diezemann, B. Geil, and H. Sillescu, Europhys. Lett. 36, 55 (1996).
49. S. C. Kuebler, A. Heuer, and H. W. Spiess, Macromolecules 29, 7089 (1996);
50. A. Heuer, J. Leisen, S. C. Kuebler, and H. W. Spiess, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7088 (1996).
51. p)〉 pattern. Therefore the determination of the jump angle distribution should not be affected by spin diffusion.
52. J. C. Dyre, N. B. Olsen, and T. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2171 (1996);
53. J. C. Dyre (private communication).
54. Also F. Fujara, W. Petry, R. M. Diehl, W. Schnauss, and H. Sillescu, Europhys. Lett. 14, 563 (1991) find that the deuteron spin-lattice times measured for the C-D and O-D deuterons are identical in the regime of the α relaxation. In particular, this means that no indications for intramolecular reorientations were obtained.
55. R. Böhmer, R. V. Chamberlin, G. Diezemann, B. Geil, A. Heuer, G. Hinze, S. C. Kuebler, R. Richert, B. Schiener, H. Sillescu, H. W. Spiess, U. Tracht, and M. Wilhelm, J. Non-Cryst. Solids (in press).
56. G. Hinze, G. Diezemann, and H. Sillescu (to be published).