Effect of disorder on charge-density wave and superconducting order in the half-filled attractive Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 1185-1193

  Huscroft, C ^a   Scalettar, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000261165     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1185     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. R. Micnas, J. Ranninger and S. Robaszkiewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
2. R. T. Scalettar, E. Y. Loh, Jr., J. E. Gubernatis, A. Moreo, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1407 (1989).
3. R. M. Fye, M. J. Martins, D. J. Scalapino, J. Wagner and W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7311 (1992).
4. M. Imada, Physica C 185-189, 1447 (1991).
5. F. F. Assaad, W. Hanke and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1915 (1993).
6. F. F. Assaad, W. Hanke and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4327 (1994).
7. F.F. Assaad, R. Preuss, A. Muramatsu and W. Hanke, J. Low Temp. Phys. 95, 251 (1994).
8. Pairing correlations are studied in a three-dimensional attractive Hubbard model in Raimundo R. dos Santos, Phys. Rev. B 50, 635 (1994). Pairing and cdw correlations on a triangular lattice are discussed in Raimundo R. dos Santos, ibid. 48, 3976 (1993).
9. A. Moreo and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 946 (1991).
10. A. Moreo, Phys. Rev. B 45, 5059 (1992).
11. M. Randeria, N. Trivedi, A. Moreo and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2001 (1992).
12. N. Trivedi and M. Randeria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 312 (1995).
13. A. Taraphder, Rahul Pandit, H. R. Krishnamurthy and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 863 (1996). For theoretical reviews, see P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985).
14. D. Belitz and T. Kirkpatrick, Rev. Mod. Phys.ibid. 66, 261 (1994).
15. D. B. Haviland, Y. Liu, and A. M. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2180 (1989).
16. A. F. Hebard and M. A. Paalanen, Phys. Rev. Lett.ibid. 65, 927 (1990).
17. J. M. Valles, R. C. Dynes and J. P. Garno, Phys. Rev. Lett.ibid. 69, 3567 (1992).
18. A. Yazdani and A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. Lett.ibid. 74, 3037 (1995).
19. M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).
20. M. P. A. Fisher, G. Grinstein and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 587 (1990).
21. M. Cha, M. P. A. Fisher, S. M. Girvin, M. Wallin and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 44, 6883 (1991).
22. E. S. Sorensen, M. Wallin, S. M. Girvin and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 828 (1992).
23. K. J. Runge, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13 136 (1992).
24. G. G. Batrouni, R. T. Scalettar and G. T. Zimanyi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1765 (1990).
25. R. T. Scalettar, G. G. Batrouni and G. T. Zimanyi, Phys. Rev. Lett.ibid. 66, 3144 (1991).
26. G. G. Batrouni, B. Larson, R. T. Scalettar, J. Tobochnik and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9628 (1993).
27. W. Krauth, N. Trivedi and D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2307 (1991).
28. M. Makivic, N. Trivedi and S. Ullah, Phys. Rev. Lett.ibid. 71, 2307 (1993).
29. N. Trivedi, R. T. Scalettar and M. Randeria, Phys. Rev. B 54, 3756 (1996).
30. R. Blankenbecler, R. L. Sugar and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2278 (1981).
31. S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, E. Y. Loh, Jr., J. E. Gubernatis and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. B 40, 506 (1989).
32. H. F. Trotter, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 545 (1959).
33. M. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. 113A, 299 (1985).
34. R. M. Fye, Phys. Rev. B 33, 6271 (1986).
35. J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4403 (1985).
36. P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959).
37. M. Ma and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 32, 5658 (1985).
38. 〈k〉=0 was used to signal the Mott transition within the Gutzwiller approximation of the fermion Hubbard model, but more recent work has emphasized this is not an appropriate criterion. For results on the behavior of 〈k〉 at the Mott insulator transition in the boson Hubbard model see G. G. Batrouni, R. T. Scalettar and G. T. Zimanyi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1765 (1990).
39. J. E. Hirsch and S. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 591 (1989). The demonstration of long-range order in the large-U, Heisenberg, limit is contained in J. D. Reger and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 37, 5978 (1988).
40. S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. B 40, 506 (1989).
41. D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 37, 2380 (1988).
42. A. W. Sandvik and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2777 (1994).
43. M. Ulmke, V. Janis and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10 411 (1995).
44. N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966).
45. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 24, 1391 (1981). This reference also shows a phase diagram for the Heisenberg model in a uniform magnetic field. The related, 2D XY planar rotator model, in which the spins are constrained to lie in the xy plane, has a slightly higher (Formula presented) of 0.8967(2). See R. Gupta, J. DeLapp, G. G. Batrouni, G. C. Fox, C. F. Baillie and J. Apostolakis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1996 (1988).
46. S. H. Shenker and J. Tobochnik, Phys. Rev. B 22, 4462 (1980).
47. P. Kopietz and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. Bibid. 40, 4858 (1989).
48. Y. Imry and S. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1399 (1975).
49. R. Micnas, S. Robaszkiewicz and K. A. Chao, Physica A 131, 393 (1985).