The Physicochemical Origins of Coincident Epitaxy in Molecular Overlayers: Lattice Modeling vs Potential Energy Calculations

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 103, Issue 32, 1999, Pages 6723-6733

  Last, Julie A ^a   Hooks, Daniel E ^a   Hillier, Andrew C ^a,b   Ward, Michael D ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000260857     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp984101j     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. (a) Aviram, A.; Ratner, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1972, 29, 277.
2. (b) Carter, F. L., Ed. Molecular Electronic Devices; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1982.
3. (c) Ashwell, G. J., Ed. Molecular Electronics; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992.
4. Strukelj, Marko; Jordan, R. H.; Dodabalapur, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1213.
5. Kido, J.; Kimura, M.; Nagaim, K. Science 1995, 67, 1332.
6. Tang, C. W.; Van Slyke, S. A.; Chen, C. H. J. Appl. Phys. 1989, 65, 3610.
7. Tang, C. W.; Van Slyke, S. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913.
8. Horowitz, G.; Kouki, F.; Spearman, P.; Fichou, D.; Nogues, C.; Pan, X.; Gamier, F. Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 242.
9. Greenham, N. C.; Moratti, S. C.; Bradley, D. D. C.; Friend, R. H.; Holmes, A. B. Nature 1993, 44, 201.
10. Hiramato, M.; Fujiwara, H.; Yokoyama, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1991, 58, 1062.
11. Hiramato, M.; Fujiwara, H.; Yokoyama, M. J. Appl. Phys. 1992, 72, 3781.
12. Haddon, R. C.; Perel, A. S.; Morris, R. C.; Palstra, T. T. M.; Hebard, A. F.; Fleming, R. M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 67, 121.
13. Brown, A. R.; Deleeuw, D. M.; Lous, E. J.; Havinga, E. E. Synth. Met. 1994, 66, 257.
14. Tang, C. W. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1986, 48, 183.
15. Liu, C.-Y.; Lynch, V.; Bard, A. J. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 943.
16. Epitaxial Growth; Matthews, J., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1975.
17. Hillier, A. C.; Ward, M. D. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 14037.
18. (a) Collins, G. E.; Nebesny, K. W.; England, C. D.; Chau, L.; Lee, P. A.; Parkinson, B.; Fernando, Q.; Armstrong, N. R. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 1992, 10, 2902.
19. (b) Armstrong, N. R.; Nebesny, K. W.; Collins, G. E.; Chau, L.-K.; Lee, P. A.; England, C. D.; Diehl, D.; Douskey, M.; Parkinson, B. Thin Solid Films 1992, 216, 90.
20. (c) Nebesny, K. W.; Collins, G. E.; Lee, P. A.; Chau, L.-K.; Danziger, J.; Osburn, E.; Armstrong, N. R. Chem. Mater. 1991, 3, 829.
21. (d) Ludwig, C.; Gompf, B.; Glatz, W.; Peterson, J.; Eisenmenger, W.; Möbus, M.; Zimmermann, U.; Karl, N. Z. Phys. B 1992, 86, 397.
22. (e) Ludwig, C.; Gompf, B.; Peterson, J.; Strohmaier, R.; Eisenmenger, W. Z. Phys. B 1994, 93, 365.
23. (f) Schmitz-Hübsch, T.; Fritz, T.; Sellam, F.; Staub, R.; Leo, K. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, 7972.
24. (g) Fenter, P.; Schreiber, F.; Zhou, L.; Eisenberger, P.; Forrest, S. R. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 3046.
25. (a) Forrest, S. R.; Zhang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 11297.
26. (b) Zhang, Y.; Forrest, S. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 2765.
27. Forrest, S. R. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1793.
28. 2 and HOPG substrates. Zimmermann, U.; Karl, N. Surf. Sci. 1992, 268, 296.
29. Last, J. A.; Hillier, A. C.; Hooks, D. E.; Maxson, J. B.; Ward, M. D. Chem. Mater. 1997, 10, 4422.
30. Thakur, M.; Haddon, R. C.; Glarum, S. H. J. Cryst. Growth 1990, 106, 724.
31. Reeves, N. J.; Evans, J. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17297.
32. Hoshino, A.; Isoda, S.; Kurata, H.; Kobayashi, T. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 4113.
33. Rappe, A. K.; Casewit, C. J.; Colwell, K. S.; Goddard, W. A., III; Skiff, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024.
34. Williams, J. M.; Emge, T. J.; Wang, H. H.; Beno, M. A.; Copps, P. T.; Hall, L. N.; Carlson, K. D.; Crabtree, G. W. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 2558. Cambridge Stuctural Database entry CILHIO02.
35. Cambridge Stuctural Database entry LENPEZ Klebe, G. private communication, 1994.
36. 0 value of 0.5 at 12.7° with β= 83.6° can be produced by altering the EpiCalc algorithm so that the overlayer is rotated clockwise (b1 clockwise from a1) instead of counterclockwise.
37. The angle of azimuth in refs 17 and 18 actually was reported to be θ = 8.4°. However, this value was based on the angle between b1 and a vector rotated 30° from a1.
38. Kobayashi, A.; Das Sharma, S. Phys. Rev. B 1987, 55, 8042.
39. 2 will be 55% (= 1 + 2 +... + 9 + 10).
40. Bruce, L. A.; Jaeger, H. Philos. Mag. A 1978, 38, 223.
41. Bruce, L. A., Jaeger, H. Philos. Mag. A 1979, 40, 97.
42. Ramirez, R.; Rahman, A.; Schuller, I. K. Phys. Rev. B 1984, 30, 6208.
43. Fecht, H. J. Philos. Mag. Lett. 1989, 60, 81.
44. Grey, F., Bohr, J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1993, 65/66, 35.