The effects of computer versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of anger and revenge with an inmate population

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 159-166

  Ford, B Douglas ^a   Vitelli, Romeo ^b   Stuckless, Noreen ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000254066     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(95)00026-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Davis, C., & Cowles, M. (1989). Automated psychological testing: Method of administration, need for approval, and measures of anxiety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 311-320.
2. Erdman, H. P., Klein, M. H., & Greist, J. H. (1985). Direct patient computer interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 760-773.
3. Farrell, A. D., Camplair, P. S., & McCullough, L. (1987). Identification of target complaints by computer interview: Evaluation of the computerized assessment system for psychotherapy evaluation and research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 691-700.
4. Ford, B. D., & Vitelli, R. (1992). Inmate attitudes towards computerized clinical interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 223-230.
5. George, C. E, Lankford, J. S., & Wilson, S. E. (1992). The effects of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of negative affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 203-209.
6. Harrell, T. H., Honaker, L. M., Hetu, M., & Oberwager, J. (1987). Computerized versus traditional administration of the multidimensional aptitude battery-verbal scale: An examination of reliability and validity. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 129-137.
7. Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49-59.
8. Holden, R. R., & Hickman, D. (1987). Computerized versus standard administration of the Jenkins Activity Survey (Form T). Journal of Human Stress, 13, 175-179.
9. Lambert, M. E., Andrews, R. H., Rylee, K., & Skinner, J. R. (1987). Equivalence of computerized and traditional MMPI administration with substance abusers. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 139-143.
10. Lautenschlager, G. J., & Flaherty, V. L. (1990). Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 310-314.
11. Lukin, M. E., Dowd, T., Plake, B. S., & Kraft, R. G. (1985). Comparing computerized versus traditional psychological assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 49-58.
12. Malouff, J. M., & Schutte, N. S. (1986). Development and validation of a measure of irrational belief. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 860-862.
13. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.
14. Runyon, R. P., & Haber, A. (1988). Fundamentals of behavioral statistics. New York: Random House.
15. Schuldberg, D. (1988). The MMPI is less sensitive to the automated testing format than it is to repeated testing: Item and scale effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 285-298.
16. Simola, S. K., & Holden, R. R. (1992). Equivalence of computerized and standard administration of the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 287-294.
17. Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Crane, R., Russell, S., Westbury, L., Barker, L., Johnson, E., Knight, J., & Marks, E. (1979). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida Human Resources Institute.
18. Spielberger, C. D., Johnson, E. H., Jacobs, G. A., & Worden, T. J. (1985). The experience and expression of anger: Construction and validation of anger scale. In M. A. Chesney & R. H. Rosenman (Eds.), Anger and hostility in cardio vascular and behavior disorders. New York: Hemisphere/McGraw.
19. Spielberger, C. D., Johnson, E. H., Jacobs, G. A., Krasner, S. S., Oesterle, S. E., & Worden, T. J. (1986). The Anger Expression (AX) Scale. Tampa, FL: Human Resources Institute, University of South Florida.
20. Stuckless, N., Ford B. D., & Vitelli, R. (1995). Vengeance, anger, and irrational beliefs in inmates: A caveat regarding social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 1-6.
21. Stuckless, N., & Goranson, R. (1992). The vengeance scale: Development of a measure of attitudes toward revenge. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 25-42.
22. Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Jelsma, O. (1988). The Matching Familiar Figures Test: Computer or experimenter controlled administration. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 161-164.
23. Vansickle, T. R., & Kapes, J. T. (1993). Comparing paper-pencil and computer-based versions of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 441-449.
24. Watson, C. G., Thomas, D., & Anderson, P. E. (1992). Do computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventories underestimate booklet-based scores? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 744-748.
25. White, D. M., Clements, C. B., & Fowler, R. D. (1985). A comparison of computer administration with standard administration of the MMPI. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 153-162.
26. Wilson, F. R., Genco, K. T., & Yager, G. G. (1985). Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 265-275.