First iteration within the high-frequency Floquet theory of laser-atom interactions

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 2513-2521

  Marinescu, M ^a,b   Gavrila, M ^a,b  

^a HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS   (United States)

^b FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000226506     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2513     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. M. Gavrila and J. Z. Kaminski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 614 (1984).
2. M. Gavrila, in Fundamentals of Laser Interactions, edited by F. Ehlotzky, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 229 (Springer, Berlin, 1985), p. 3.
3. M. Gavrila (Academic, New York, 1992), p. 435.
4. Shih-I Chu, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 21, 197 (1985)
5. R. M. Potvliege and R. Shakeshaft, in Atoms in Intense Laser Fields, edited by M. Gavrila (Academic, New York, 1992), p. 373.
6. W. Pauli and M. Fierz, Nuovo Cimento 15, 167 (1938).
7. H. A. Kramers, Collected Scientific Papers (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1956), p. 866.
8. W. C. Henneberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 838 (1968).
9. see also F. H. Faisal, J. Phys. B 6, L89 (1973).
10. A rigorous mathematical study of the convergence of the HFFT for scattering has been recently done by Ph. A. Martin and M. Sassoli de Bianchi, J. Phys. A 28, 2403 (1995).
11. M. Pont, N. Walet and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. A 41, 477 (1990).
12. M. Pont, N. Walet, M. Gavrila and C. W. McCurdy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 939 (1988).
13. H. G. Muller and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1693 (1993).
14. J. Shertzer, A. Chandler and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2039 (1994).
15. (a) M. Pont and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2362 (1990).
16. R. J. Vos and M. Gavrila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 170 (1992); see also Ref. 3, Sec. VI.
17. (b) for general overviews on stabilization, see J. H. Eberly and K. C. Kulander, Science 262, 1229 (1993).
18. M. Gavrila, in Multiphoton Processes VI, edited by D. K. Evans and S. L. Chin (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), p. 183.
19. (c) the experiments were carried out by M. P. de Boer, J. H. Hoogenraad, R. B. Vrijen, L. D. Noordam and H. G. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3263 (1993).
20. M. P. de Boer, J. H. Hoogenraad, R. B. Vrijen, L. D. Noordam and H. G. Muller, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4085 (1994).
21. R. Bhatt, B. Piraux and K. Burnett, Phys. Rev. A 37, 98 (1988).
22. J. N. Bardsley, A. Szöke and M. J. Comella, J. Phys. B 21, 3899 (1988).
23. J. N. Bardsley and M. J. Comella, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2252 (1989).
24. G. Yao and Shih-I Chu, Phys. Rev. A 45, 6735 (1992).
25. (a)M. Dörr, R. M. Potvliege, D. Proulx and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3729 (1991).
26. (b) M. Dörr, P. G. Burke, C. J. Joachin, C. J. Noble, J. Purvis and M. Terao-Dunsheath, J. Phys. B 26, L275 (1993).
27. L. Dimou and F. H. M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4442 (1992).
28. L. Dimou and F. H. M. Faisal, Phys. Rev. A 49, 4564 (1994).
29. R. M. Potvliege and P. H. G. Smith, Phys. Rev. A 48, R46 (1993).
30. A. S. Fearnside, R. M. Potvliege and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1471 (1995).
31. E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1970), Chap. 6, Sec. 3.
32. K. Burnett et al, J. Phys. B 26, 561 (1993)], has proven to be superfluous.
33. A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 233, 70 (1955).
34. R. S. Friedman, M. J. Jamieson and S. C. Preston, Comput. Phys. Commun. 58, 17 (1990).
35. B. R. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 4086 (1978).
36. e.g., see J. G. Cordes and M. G. Calkin, J. Phys. B 13, 4111 (1980).
37. W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation (Clarendon, Oxford, 1954), Sec. 21 and Fig. 9. This could explain the large errors mentioned in Ref. 16.
38. R. Shakeshaft, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 705 (1987).