Optimization of gutzwiller wave functions in quantum monte carlo

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 59, Issue 24, 1999, Pages 15632-15640

  Martin, RichardM ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000222290     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.15632     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 159 (1963).
2. J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A276, 238 (1963).
3. J. Kanamori, Prog. Theor. Phys.30, 275 (1963).
4. E. Lieb and F. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1445 (1968).
5. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996).
6. M. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev.134, A923 (1964).
7. M. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev.137, A1726 (1965).
8. R. Jastrow, Phys. Rev.98, 1479 (1955).
9. W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 121 (1987).
10. W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. B37, 7382 (1988).
11. F. Gebhard and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1472 (1987).
12. F. Gebhard and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. B38, 6911 (1988).
13. W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 324 (1989).
14. D. Vollhardt, Rev. Mod. Phys.56, 99 (1984).
15. D. Ceperley, G. Chester, and M. Kalos, Phys. Rev. B16, 3081 (1977).
16. P. Horsch and T. Kaplan, J. Phys. C16, L1203 (1983).
17. D. ten Haaf, H. van Bemmel, J. van Leeuwen, and W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2442 (1994).
18. D. ten Haaf, H. van Bemmel, J. van Leeuwen, W. van Saarloos, and D. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B51, 13 039 (1995).
19. T. Kaplan, P. Horsch, and P. Fulde, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 889 (1982).
20. C. Umrigar, K. Wilson, and J. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 1719 (1988).
21. A. Harju, B. Barbiellini, S. Siljamaki, R. Nieminen, and G. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1173 (1997).
22. This complication arises from the fact that the number of transitions allowed by the Pauli principle in general is different for different configurations. This issue is discussed in Ref. 16.
23. H. Yokoyama and H. Shiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.56, 1490 (1987).
24. D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 566 (1980).
25. D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Science231, 555 (1986).
26. M. Calandra Buonaura and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B57, 11 446 (1998).
27. G. Bachelet and A. Cosentini, in Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry, Vol. 525 of NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, edited by C. Umrigar and M. Nightingale (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998).
28. N. Trivedi and D. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B41, 4552 (1990).
29. O. Gunnarsson, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 575 (1997).
30. O. Gunnarsson, E. Koch, and R. Martin, Phys. Rev. B54, R11 026 (1996).
31. F. Aryasetiawan, O. Gunnarsson, E. Koch, and R. Martin, Phys. Rev. B55, R10 165 (1997).
32. E. Koch, O. Gunnarsson, and R. Martin, in Electronic Properties of Novel Materials, edited by H. Kuzmany, J. Fink, M. Mehring, and S. Roth (AIP, New York, 1998).
33. E. Koch, O. Gunnarsson, and R. Martin, in Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry (Ref. 27).