Fibril angle variability in earlywood of Norway spruce using soft rot cavities and polarization confocal microscopy

Journal of Wood Science

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 255-263

  Bergander, Anna ^a   Brändström, Jonas ^b   Daniel, Geoffrey ^b   Salmén, Lennart ^a  

^a INNVENTIA AB   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fibril angle; Picea abies; Polarization confocal microscopy; Soft rot cavities; X ray diffraction

Indexed keywords

MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; MORPHOLOGY; POLARIZATION; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ROT CAVITIES;

WOOD;

ANATOMY; MICROSCOPY; POLARIZATION; TRACHEIDS; WOOD; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ABIES; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 0000212184     PISSN: 14350211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00831344     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Fengel D, Stoll M (1973) Variation in cell cross-sectional area, cell-wall thickness and wall layers of spruce tracheids within an annual ring. Holzforschung 27:1-7
2. Preston RD (1974) The physical biology of plant cell walls. Chapman and Hall, London, p 491
3. Cave ID (1969) The longitudinal Young's modulus of Pinus radiata. Wood Sci Technol 3:40-48
4. Bendtsen BA, Senft J, Senft JF (1986) Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci 18:23-38
5. Page DH, El Hosseiny F, Winkler K, Lancaster APS (1977) Elastic modulus of single wood pulp fibers. TAPPI J 60:114-117
6. Armstrong JP, Kyanka GH, Thorpe JL (1977) S2 fibril angle-elastic modulus relationship of TMP Scotch pine fibers. Wood Fiber Sci 10:72-80
7. Kellogg RM, Thykesson E, Warren WG (1975) The influence of wood and fibre properties on kraft converting-paper quality. TAPPI J 58:113-116
8. Barrett JD, Schniewind AP, Taylor RL (1972) Theoretical shrinkage model for wood cell walls. Wood Fiber Sci 4:178-192
9. Meylan BA (1968) Cause of high longitudinal shrinkage in wood. For Prod J 18(4):75-78
10. Von Kollmann F, Antonoff M (1943) Beitrag zur Erforschung des submikroskopischen Feinbaus von Holz. Holz Roh Werkstoff 6:41-45
11. Hiller CH (1964) Correlation of fibril angle with wall thickness of tracheids in summerwood of slash and loblolly pine. TAPPI J 47:125-128
12. Donaldson LA (1992) Within- and between-tree variation in microfibril angle in Pinus radiata. NZ J For Sci 22:77-86
13. Sahlberg U, Salmén L, Oscarsson A (1997) The fibrillar orientation in the S2-layer of wood fibres as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. Wood Sci Technol 31:77-86
14. Saranpää P, Serimaa R, Andersson S, Pesonen E, Suni T, Paakari T (1998) Variation of microfibril angle of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.): comparing x-ray diffraction and optical methods. In: Butterfield BG (ed) Microfibril angle in wood. University of Canterbury, Westport, NZ, pp 240-252
15. Marton R, Rushton P, Sacco JS, Sumiya K (1972) Dimensions and ultrastructure in growing fibers. TAPPI J 55:1499-1504
16. McMillin CW (1973) Fibril angle of loblolly pine wood as related to specific gravity, growth rate and distance from pith. Wood Sci Technol 7:251-255
17. Paakkari T, Serimaa R (1984) A study of the structure of wood cells by X-ray diffraction. Wood Sci Technol 18:79-85
18. Marton R, McGovern SD (1970) Relation of crystallite dimensions and fibrillar orientation to fiber properties. In: The physics and chemistry of wood pulp fibres. TAPPI 8:153-158
19. Cave ID (1966) Theory of X-ray measurement of microfibril angle in wood. For Prod J 16:37-42
20. Page DH (1969) A method for determining the fibrillar angle in wood tracheids. J Microsc 90:137-143
21. Leney L (1981) A technique for measuring fibril angle using polarized light. Wood Fiber Sci 13:13-16
22. Donaldson LA (1991) The use of pit apertures as windows to measure microfibril angle in chemical pulp fibers. Wood Fiber Sci 23:290-295
23. Ye C, Sundström O (1997) Determination of S2-fibril-angle and fiber-wall thickness by microscopic transmission ellipsometry. TAPPI J 80:181-190
24. Huang C, Kutcha NP, Leaf GL, Megraw RA (1998) Comparison of microfibril angle measurement techniques. In: Butterfield BG (ed) Microfibril angle in wood. University of Canterbury, Westport, NZ, pp 177-205
25. Bailey IW, Vestal MG (1937) The orientation of cellulose in the secondary wall of tracheary cells. J Arnold Arbor Harv Univ 18: 185-195
26. Senft JF, Bendtsen BA (1985) Measuring microfibrillar angles using light microscopy. Wood Fiber Sci 17:564-567
27. Kyrkjeeide PA (1990) A wood quality study of suppressed, intermediate and dominant trees of plantation grown Picea abies. Forest Products Labaratory, Madison, WI, p 145
28. Herman M, Dutilleul P, Avella-Shaw T (1999) Growth rate effects on intra-ring and inter-ring trajectories of microfibril angle in Norway spruce (Picea abies). IAWA J 20:3-21
29. Kataoka Y, Saiki H, Fujita M (1992) Arrangement and superimposition of cellulose microfibrils in the secondary walls of coniferous tracheids (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:327-335
30. Abe H, Ohtani J, Fukazawa K (1991) FE-SEM observations on the microfibrillar orientation in the secondary wall of tracheids. IAWA Bull 12:431-438
31. Abe H, Ohtani J, Fukazawa K (1992) Microfibrillar orientation of the innermost surface of conifer tracheid walls. IAWA J 13:411-417
32. Prodhan AKMA, Funada R, Ohtani J, Abe H, Fukazawa K (1995) Orientation of microfibrils and microtubules in developing tension-wood fibres of Japanese ash (Fraxinus mandshurica var. Japonica). Planta 196:577-585
33. Verbelen J-P, Stickens D (1995) In vivo determination of fibril orientation in plant cell walls with polarization CSLM. J Microsc 177(Pt 1):1-6
34. Jang HF (1998) Measurement of fibril angle in wood fibres with polarization confocal microscopy. J Pulp Pap Sci 24:224-230
35. Khalili S (1999) Microscopical studies on plant fibre structure. PhD thesis, Department of Wood Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, p 33
36. Anagnost SE, Mark RE, Hanna RB (2000) Utilization of soft-rot cavity orientation for the determination of microfibril angle. Part I. Wood Fiber Sci 32:81-87
37. Khalili S, Nilsson T, Daniel G (2001) The use of soft rot fungi for determining the microfibrillar orientation in the S2 layer of pine tracheids. Holz Roh Werkst 58:439-447
38. Bergander A, Salmén L (2000) Variations in transverse fibre wall properties: relations between elastic properties and structure. Holzforschung 54:654-660
39. Meylan BA (1967) Measurement of microfibril angle by X-ray diffraction. For Prod J 17(5):51-58
40. Karlsson H, Fransson P-I, Mohlin U-B (1999) STFI fibermaster. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on new available technologies. June 1-4, 1999, Stockholm, SPCI, Sweden, pp 367-374
41. Polge H (1978) Fifteen years of wood radiation microdensiometry. Wood Sci Technol 12:187-196
42. Nilsson T, Daniel G, Kirk TK, Obst JR (1989) Chemistry and microscopy of wood decay by some higher ascomycetes. Holzforschung 43:11-18
43. Lichtenegger H, Reiterer A, Stanzl TSE, Fratzl P (1999) Variation of cellulose microfibril angles in softwoods and hardwoods: a possible strategy of mechanical optimization. J Struct Biol 128:257-269
44. Kantola M, Seitsonen S (1969) On the relation between tracheid length and microfibrillar orientation measured by X-ray diffraction in conifer wood. Ann Acad Sci Fenn 300:2-10
45. Necesany V (1961) The variation of "normal" wood in view of its structure. Faserforsch Textiltechn 12:169-178
46. Preston RD (1934) The organization of the cell wall of the conifer tracheid. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 224:131-173
47. Hirakawa Y, Fujisawa Y (1995) The relationships between microfibril angles of the S2 layer and latewood tracheid lengths in elite sugi tree (Cryptomeria japonica) clones (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 41:123-131
48. Yasue K, Funada R, Kobayashi O, Ohtani J (2000) The effects of tracheid dimensions on variations in maximum density of Picea glehnii and relationships to climatic factors. Trees Struct Function 14:223-229
49. Gindl W, Wimmer R (2000) Relationship between lignin content and tracheid morphology in spruce. In: Proceedings of 3rd plant biomechanics conference, August-September, Freiburg, Germany, pp 163-168