The Reconstruction of Upwind Fluxes for Conservation Laws: Its Behavior in Dynamic and Steady State Calculations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 144, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 237-256

  Choi, Hwajeong ^a   Liu, Jian Guo ^a  

^a Temple University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biased averaging procedure; Finite volume method; Flux splitting

Indexed keywords

RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

BIASED AVERAGING PROCEDURE; CONSERVATION LAW; EULER'S EQUATION; FINITE-VOLUME METHOD; FLUX SPLITTING; HIGHER ORDER ACCURACY; SIMPLE++; SOLUTION RECONSTRUCTION; STEADY STATE CALCULATIONS; TYPE METHODS;

FINITE VOLUME METHOD;

EID: 0000198178     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5970     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson W., Thomas J., van Leer B. Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations. AIAA J. 24:1986;1453.
2. Brio M., Wu C. C. An upwind difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 75:1988;400.
3. H. Choi, J.-G. Liu, Shock capturing with a simple biased averaging procedure.
4. Choi H. Robust Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws Using a Biased Averaging Procedure. 1997.
5. Dervieux A., van Leer B., Periaux J., Rizzi A. Numerical Simulation of Compressible Euler Flows. 26:1989.
6. Glaz H., Liu T.-P. The asymptotic analysis of wave interactions and numerical calculations of transonic nozzle flow. Adv. Appl. Math. 5:1984;111.
7. Harten A., Engquist B., Osher S., Chakravarthy S. J. Comput. Phys. 71:1987;231.
8. Harten A., Lax P., van Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev. 25:1983;35.
9. Jameson A., Lax P. D. Conditions for the Construction of Multi-point Total Variation Diminishing Difference Schemes. 1984.
10. Jameson A., Schmidt W., Turkel E. Numerical solutions of inviscid transonic flow over a complete aircraft, AIAA Paper 81-1259. Jan. 1981.
11. Jiang G., Shu C-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126:1996;202.
12. G. Jiang, E. Tadmor, Nonoscillatory central schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.
13. Jin S. Numerical integrations of systems of conservation laws of mixed type. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55:1995;1536.
14. Jin S., Liu J.-G. The effects of numerical viscosities. I. Slowly moving shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 126:1996;373.
15. Jin S., Xin Z. The relaxation schemes for systems of conservation laws in arbitrary space dimensions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 55:1995;235.
16. Karni S., Čanić S. Computations of slowly moving shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 136:1997;132.
17. Liou M.-S., Steffen C. J. A new flux splitting scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 107:1993;23.
18. Liu X-D., Osher S., Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115:1994;200.
19. X-D. Liu, S. Osher, Convex ENO high order multidimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered grids.
20. Mandel J., Deshpande S. Kinetic flux vector splitting for Euler equations. Comp. Fluids. 23:1994;447.
21. Nessyahu H., Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87:1990;408.
22. Osher S., Solomon F. Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Math. Comp. 38:1982;339.
23. Perthame B. Second order Boltzmann schemes for compressible Euler equations in one and two space dimensions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29:1992;1.
24. Quirk J. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 18:1994;555.
25. Sanders R., Prendergast K. The possible relation of the three-kiloparsec arm to explosions in the galactic nucleus. Astrophys. J. 188:1974.
26. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83:1989;32.
27. Steger J. L., Warming R. F. Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite difference methods. J. Comput. Phys. 40:1981;263.
28. Thomas J., Salas M. Far-field boundary conditions for transonic lifting solutions to the Euler equations. AIAA J. 24:1986;1074.
29. van Leer B. Flux vector splitting for the Euler equations. Lecture Notes in Physics. 170:1981;354.
30. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 23:1977;263.
31. Venkatakrishnan V. Convergence to steady state solutions of the Euler equations on unstructured grids with limiters. J. Comput. Phys. 118:1995;120.
32. Woodward P., Colella P. The numerical simulation of two dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;115.