BackCalculating CleanUp Targets in Probabilistic Risk Assessments When the Acceptability of Cancer Risk is Defined Under Different Risk Management Policies

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 101-120

  Thompson, Kimberly M ^b  

^a Alceon Corporation   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000143361     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: 15497860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807039509379986     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alefeld G. and Herzberger J. 1983. Introduction to Interval Computations New York Academic Press.
2. Benjamin J.R. and Cornell C.A. 1970. Probability Statistics and Decisions for Civil Engineers New York McGraw Hill.
3. Bogen K.T. 1993. RiskQ: An Interactive Approach to Probability Uncertainty and Statistics for Use with Mathematica™ Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Livermore CA.
4. Burmaster D.E. Lloyd K.J. and Thompson K.M. 1994. The need for new methods to backcalculate soil cleanup targets in interval and probabilistic cancer risk assessments. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 1 89-100
5. Carrington C.D. 1993. Quantitative Risk and Response Contaminants Branch Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition US Food and Drug Administration Washington DC.
6. ChemRisk. 1994. Determination of Health-Based Soil CleanUp Levels using Probabilistic Analyses Technical Report Prepared for Maxus Energy Corporation by Chem Risk Division of McLaren/Hart Environmental Engineering Corporation Cleveland OH 10 October 1994.
7. Clemen R.T. 1991. Making Hard Decisions Belmont CA Duxbury Press Wadsworth Publishing Company.
8. Cooke R.M. 1991. Experts in Uncertainty Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science Oxford UK Oxford University Press.
9. D’Agostino R.B. and Stephens M.A Eds. Goodness-Of-Fit Techniques New York Marcel Dekker.
10. Dedsioneering Inc. 1994. Manual for Crystal Ball Denver CO.
11. Evans M. Hastings N. and Peacock B. 1993 Statistical Distributions Second Edition New Yorkjohn Wiley and Sons.
12. Feller W. 1968. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications Volume I Third Edition New York John Wiley and Sons.
13. Feller W. 1971. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications Volume II Second Edition New York John Wiley and Sons.
14. Ferson S. 1994. Untangling Assumptions About Independence in Ecological Risk Assessments presented at the Ninth Annual Conference on Contaminated Soils University of Massachusetts Amherst MA 20 October 1994.
15. Ferson S. and Long T. F. 1994. Deconvolution can reduce uncertainty in risk analyses Risk Anal. In Review.
16. Frey H.C. 1992. Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty and Variability in Environmental Policy Making Fellowship Program for Environmental Science and Engineering American Association for the Advancement of Science Washington DC.
17. Gilbert R.O. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring New York Van Nostrand Reinhold.
18. Hadley G. 1964. NonLinear and Dynamic Programming Reading MA Addison Wesley.
19. Hoffman F.O. and Hammonds J.S. 1993. Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability Risk Anal. In Press.
20. Lloyd K.J. Thompson K.M. and Burmaster D.E. 1992. Probabilistic Techniques for BackCalculating Soil CleanUp Targets In Superfund Risk Assessment in Soil Contamination Studies ASTM STP 1158. (Hoddinot K.B. and Knowles G.D. Eds.) Philadelphia PA American Society for Testing and Materials.
21. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. 1993. Massachusetts Contingency Plan 310 CMR 40.0000 Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup 19 November 1993.
22. Mckone T. E. 1994 Comments and Recommendations Regarding: Determination of Health-Based Soil Clean-up Levels Using Stochastic Analysis a Technical Memorandum October 1994
23. Morgan J.T.M. 1984. Elements of Simulation London UK Chapman and Hall.
24. Morgan M.G. and Henrion M. 1990. Uncertainty Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press.
25. National Academy of Sciences. 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process Washington DC National Academy Press.
26. Palisade Corporation. 1993. Manual for @ Risk Newfield NY.
27. Rosenthal A. Gray G.M. and Graham J.D. 1992. Legislating acceptable cancer risk from exposure to toxic chemicals Ecol. Law Quart. 19, 269-362.
28. Rubinstein R.Y. 1981. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method New York John Wiley and Sons.
29. Sielken R.L. Jr. 1994. Review of the Successful Determination of Health-Based Soil Cleanup Levels using Stochastic Analysis a Technical Memorandum prepared by Sielken Inc. 28 September 1994.
30. Springer M.D. 1979. The Algebra of Random Variables New York John Wiley and Sons.
31. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1990. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan revisions to 40 CFR Part 300 published as 55 FR 866 et seq. 8 March 1990 Washington DC.
32. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Human Health Evaluation Manual Part A Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Interim Final EPA/540/1-89/002 Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Washington DC.
33. Wolfram S. 1991. Mathematica™ A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer Second Edition Addison-Wesley Redwood City CA.