Variations in hydraulic conductivity with scale of measurement during aquifer tests in heterogeneous, porous carbonate rocks

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 204-215

  Schulze Makuch, Dirk ^a,c   Cherkauer, Douglas S ^b  

^a Division Fluid Management   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000141322     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100400050145     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Boulton NS, Streltsova TD (1977a) Unsteady flow to a pumped well in a two-layered water-bearing formation. J Hydrol 35:245-256
2. Boulton NS, Streltsova TD (1977b) Unsteady flow to a pumped well in a fissured water-bearing formation. J Hydrol 35:257-269
3. Bradbury KR, Muldoon MA (1988) Ground water and vadose zone monitoring. In: American Society of Testing Materials, Special Technical Publication, pp 138-151
4. Butler JJ Jr (1990) The role of pumping tests in site characterization: some theoretical considerations. Ground Water 28(3):394-402
5. Cherkauer DS, Mikulic D (1992) Development of a hydrostratigraphical model for the interaction of ground water with Lake Michigan in southeastern Wisconsin. A Final Report submitted to the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, 84 pp
6. Clauser C (1992) Permeability of crystalline rocks. EOS, Trans Am Geophys Union 73(21):233, 237-238
7. Clite N (1992) Three-dimensional simulation of ground water impacts resulting from expansion of rock quarries in the town of Lisbon, Waukesha County, Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MS Thesis, ISO pp
8. Cooper HH, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 27:526-534
9. Duffield GM, Rumbaugh JO III (1989) AQTESOLV. Aquifer Test Solver Version 1.00 Documentation. Geraghty and Miller Modeling Group, Reston, Virginia, 135 pp
10. Gernand JD, Heidtman JP (1997) Detailed pumping test to characterize a fractured bedrock aquifer. Ground Water 35(4):632-637
11. Hantush MS (1956) Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers. Trans Am Geophys Union 37(6):702-714
12. Hantush MS (1960) Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers. J Geophys Res, 65(11):3713-3725
13. Herzog BL, Morse WJ (1984) A comparison of laboratory and field determined values of hydraulic conductivity at a waste disposal site. Annual Madison Waste Conference, 7th Proceedings. Department of Engineering Professional Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 30-52
14. Mueller SD (1992) Three-dimensional digital simulation of the ground-water contribution to Lake Michigan from the Silurian aquifer of southeastern Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MS Thesis, 231 pp
15. Mulvey TJ (1995) A digital simulation of the interaction between Pleistocene and Silurian aquifers of eastern Wisconsin and Lake Michigan, U.S.A. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MS Thesis, 190 pp
16. Nader DC (1990) Three-dimensional digital simulation of the ground water-Lake Michigan hydraulic connection. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MS Thesis, 159 pp
17. Neuman SP (1990) Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivity and dispersivities in a geologic media. Water Resour Res 26(8):1749-1758
18. Papadopulos IS, Cooper HH Jr (1967) Drawdown in a well of large diameter. Water Resour Res 3:241-244
19. Röhrich T (1995) HYDRO TEC für WINDOWS. Documentation, version 2.0. Hüttenberg: Germany, 56 pp
20. Rovey CW II (1990) Stratigraphy and sedimentology of Silurian and Devonian carbonates, eastern Wisconsin, with implications for ground-water discharge into Lake Michigan. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PhD Dissertation [available on microfiche], 427 pp
21. Rovey CW II, Cherkauer DS (1995) Scale dependency of hydraulic conductivity measurements. Ground Water 33 (5):769-780
22. Sauter M (1992) Quantification and forecasting of regional groundwater flow and transport in a karst aquifer (Gallusquelle, Malm, SW Germany). Germany. Tuebinger Geowiss Arbeiten, Reihe C, C 13, 150 pp
23. Serrano SE (1997) The Theis-solution in heterogeneous aquifers. Ground Water 35(3):463-467
24. Schulze-Makuch D (1996) Facies dependent scale behavior of hydraulic conductivity and longitudinal dispersivity in the carbonate aquifer of southeastern Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PhD Dissertation [available on microfiche], 342 pp
25. Schulze-Makuch D, Cherkauer D.S. (1995) Fades dependent scale behavior of hydraulic conductivity and longitudinal dispersivity. In: Kovar K, Krásy J (ed) Groundwater quality: remediation and protection. Prague, Czech Republic, IAHS Publication 225 pp 157-164
26. Schulze-Makuch D (1997) Method developed for extrapolating scale behavior. EOS, Trans Am Geophys Union 78(1):3
27. Stober I (1996) Researchers study conductivity of crystalline rock in proposed radioactive waste site. EOS, Trans Am Geophys Union 77(10):93-94
28. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 2:519-524
29. Tidwell VC, Wilson JL (1997) Laboratory method for investigating permeability upscaling. Water Resour Res 33(7):1607-1616
30. Walton WC (1970) Groundwater resource evaluation. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
31. Webb EK (1989) Estimating groundwater discharge to Lake Michigan using a three-dimensional groundwater flow model, along a portion of the shoreline from Door County to Port Washineton, Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MS Thesis, 219 pp
32. Wenzel LK (1942) Methods for determining permeability of water bearing materials with special reference to discharging well methods. US Geol Surv Water Supply Pap 887, 192 pp