Identifying Underlying Dimensions in Spouses' Evaluations of Fairness in the Division of Household Labor

Social Science Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 305-327

  Smith, Herbert L ^a   Gager, Constance T ^a   Morgan, S Philip ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000134322     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ssre.1998.0624     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 1990;Wiley, New York.
2. Benin M. H., Agostinelli J. Husbands' and wives' satisfaction with the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 50:1988;349-361.
3. Berk S. F. The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households. 1985;Plenum, New York.
4. Bernard J. The Future of Marriage. 1972;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
5. Blair S. L., Johnson M. P. Wives' perceptions of fairness and the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 54:1992;570-581.
6. Blair S. L., Lichter D. T. Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues. 12:1991;91-113.
7. Burgess R. L., Neilson J. M. An experimental analysis of some structural determinants of equitable and inequitable exchange relations. American Sociological Review. 39:1974;427-443.
8. Cate R. M., Lloyd S. A., Henton J. M., Larson J. H. Fairness and reward levels as predictors of relationship satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly. 45:1982;177-181.
9. Clogg C. C., Shihadeh E. S. Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables. 1994;Sage, Thousand Oaks.
10. Converse J. M. Attitude measurement in sociology and psychology: The early years. Surveying Subjective Phenomena. 1984;Russell Sage Foundation, New York. p. 3-39.
11. DeMaris A., Longmore M. A. Ideology, power, and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. Social Forces. 74:1996;1043-1071.
12. Duncan O. D. Rasch measurement: Further examples and discussion. Turner C. F., Martin E. Surveying Subjective Phenomena. 1984;367-403 Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
13. Ferree M. M. Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 52:1990;886-894.
14. Ferree M. M. The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues. 12:1991;158-180.
15. Fleiss J. L., Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 33:1973;613-619.
16. Gager, C. T. 1995, Is love stronger than justice?: Perceptions of fairness in the division of household labor.
17. Gager, C. T. 1996, The role of valued outcomes, justification, and comparison referents in perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota.
18. Glass J., Fujimoto T. Housework, paid work, and depression among husbands and wives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 74:1994;179-191.
19. Goodman L. A. Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74:1979;536-552.
20. Greenstein T. N. Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces. 74:1996;1029-1042.
21. Hawkins A. J., Marshall C. M., Meiners K. M. Exploring wives' sense of fairness about family work. Journal of Family Issues. 16:1995;693-721.
22. Heinen T. Latent Class and Discrete Latent Trait Models: Similarities and Differences. 1996;Sage, Thousand Oaks.
23. Hochschild, A. Machung, A. 1989, The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, Academic Press, New York.
24. Hout M., Duncan O. D., Sobel M. E. Association and Heterogeneity: Structural Models of Similarities and Differences. Clogg C. C. Sociological Methodology 1987. 1987;145-184 American Sociological Association, Washington.
25. Lennon M. C., Rosenfield S. Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology. 100:1994;506-531.
26. Major B. Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. Shaver P., Hendrick C. Sex and Gender. 1987;124-128 Sage, Newbury Park.
27. Mederer H. J. Division of labor in two-earner homes: Task accomplishment versus household management as critical variables in perceptions about family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 55:1993;133-145.
28. Mirowsky J. Depression and marital power: An equity model. American Journal of Sociology. 91:1985;557-592.
29. Orden S., Bradburn N. Dimensions of marital happiness. American Journal of Sociology. 73:1968;715-731.
30. Perry-Jenkins M., Folk K. Class, couples, and conflict: Effects of the division of labor on assessments of marriage in dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 56:1994;165-180.
31. Raftery A. E. Bayesian model selection in social research. Marsden P. V. Sociological Methodology 1995. 1995;111-163 Blackwell, Cambridge.
32. Safilios-Rothschild C. Family sociology or wives' family sociology? A cross-cultural examination of decision making. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 32:1969;539-552.
33. Sanchez L. Gender, labor allocations and the psychology of entitlement within the home. Social Forces. 73:1994;533-553.
34. Sanchez L., Kane E. W. Women's and men's constructions of perceptions of housework fairness. Journal of Family Issues. 17:1996;358-387.
35. Smith H. L., Furstenberg F. F. Jr. Application of a response model for mother-daughter agreement by race. Social Science Research. 23:1994;136-166.
36. Smith H. L., Morgan S. P. Children's closeness to father as reported by mothers, sons and daughters: Evaluating subjective assessments with the Rasch model. Journal of Family Issues. 15:1994;3-29.
37. Sweet, J. Bumpass, L. Call, V. 1988, The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin - Madison.
38. Swidler A. Love and adulthood in American culture. Skolnick A. S., Skolnick J. H. Family in Transition. 1983;286-305 Little, Brown, Boston.
39. Thissen D., Mooney J. A. Log-linear item response models with applications to data from social surveys. Clogg C. C. Sociological Methodology 1989. 1989;299-330 Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
40. Thompson L. Family work: Women's sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues. 12:1991;181-196.
41. Thompson L., Walker A. J. Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 51:1989;845-871.
42. Traub R. E. Reliability for the Social Sciences: Theory and Applications. 1994;Sage, Thousand Oaks.
43. Zvonkovic A. M., Greaves K. M., Schmiege C. J., Hall L. D. The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 58:1996;91-100.