Nucleon strangeness and unitarity

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 2741-2755

  Musolf, M J ^a   Hammer, H W ^a   Drechsel, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000134304     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2741     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. M. J. Musolf et al., Phys. Rep.239, 1 (1994).
2. CCFR, A. O. Bazarko et al., Z. Phys. C65, 189 (1995); ZPCFD2
3. CCFR, S. A. Rabinowitz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 134 (1993).
4. MIT-Bates proposal No. 89-06, 1989, R. D. McKeown and D.H. Beck, spokespersons.
5. MIT-Bates proposal No. 94-11, 1994, M. Pitt and E. J. Beise, spokespersons.
6. CEBAF proposal No. PR-91-017, 1991, D. H. Beck, spokesperson.
7. CEBAF proposal No. PR-91-004, 1991, E. J. Beise, spokesperson.
8. CEBAF proposal No. PR-91-010, 1991, M. Finn and P. A. Souder, spokespersons.
9. Mainz proposal No. A4/1-93, 1993, D. von Harrach, spokesperson.
10. Los Alamos proposal No. 1173, W.C. Louis, spokesperson.
11. K.-F. Liu, University of Kentucky Report No. UK/95-11, 1995 (unpublished) and references therein.
12. D. B. Leinweber, Phys. Rev. D53, 5115 (1996).
13. EMC, J. Ashman et al., Nucl. Phys.B328, 1 (1989);
14. E142 Collaboration, P. L. Anthony et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 959 (1993);
15. SMC, B. Adeva et al., Phys. Lett. B302, 533 (1993);
16. SMC, D. Adams et al., Phys. Lett. B329, 399 (1994);
17. E143 Collaboration, K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 346 (1995).
18. E. J. Beise (private communication).
19. J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1992);
20. in Proceedings of the Workshop on Effective Theories of the Standard Model, edited by U.-G. Meissner (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
21. M. J. Musolf and H. Ito, INT Report Nos. DOE/ER/40561-245-INT96-00-114, nucl-th/9607021 (unpublished).
22. R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Lett. B229, 275 (1989).
23. H.-W. Hammer, U.-G. Meissner, and D. Drechsel, Phys. Lett. B367, 323 (1996).
24. M. J. Musolf and M. Burkardt, Z. Phys. C61, 433 (1994).ZPCFD2
25. W. Koepf, S. J. Pollock, and E. M. Henley, Phys. Lett. B288, 11 (1992);
26. W. Koepf and E. M. Henley, Phys. Rev. C49, 2219 (1994).
27. H. Forkel et al., Phys. Rev. C50, 3108 (1994).
28. T. Cohen, H. Forkel, and M. Nielsen, Phys. Lett. B316, 1 (1993).
29. N. W. Park, J. Schechter, and H. Weigel, Phys. Rev. D43, 869 (1991).
30. S.-T. Hong and B.-Y. Park, Nucl. Phys.A561, 525 (1993).
31. S. C. Phatak and S. Sahu, Phys. Lett. B321, 11 (1994).
32. H. Ito, Phys. Rev. C52, R1750 (1995).
33. P. Geiger and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D55, 299 (1997).
34. P. Federbush, M. L. Goldberger, and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev.112, 642 (1958).
35. G. F. Chew et al., Phys. Rev.110, 265 (1958).
36. W. R. Frazer and J. R. Fulco, Phys. Rev.117, 1603 (1960);
37. 117, 1609 (1960).
38. G. Höhler et al., Nucl. Phys.B114, 505 (1976).
39. P. Mergell, U.-G. Meissner, and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys.A596, 367 (1996);
40. H.-W. Hammer, U.-G. Meissner, and D. Drechsel, Phys. Lett. B385, 343 (1996).
41. S.D. Drell and F. Zachariasen, Electromagnetic Structure of Nucleons (Oxford University Press, New York, 1960).
42. R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev.126, 2256 (1962).
43. We are indebted to R.L. Jaffe for emphasizing this point.
44. M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)7, 404 (1959).APNYA6
45. Since the reaction (Formula presented) is an inelastic one, a partial wave expansion of the (Formula presented)-matrix element is equivalent to a partial wave expansion of the corresponding (Formula presented)-matrix element, up to constant factors.
46. S. Fubini, Y. Nambu, and V. Wataghin, Phys. Rev.111, 329 (1958), Appendix II.
47. See, e.g., J. L. Basdevant, C. D. Frogatt, and J. C. Petersen, Nucl. Phys.B72, 413 (1974); W. Männer, presented at the 17th Conference on high-energy physics, London, 1974 (unpublished).
48. W. R. Frazer and J. R. Fulco, Phys. Rev. Lett.2, 365 (1959).
49. G. Höhler and E. Pietarinen, Nucl. Phys.B95, 210 (1975).
50. See, e.g., M. F. Heyn and C. B. Lang, Z. Phys. C7, 169 (1981).ZPCFD2
51. G. Ecker et al., Phys. Lett. B223, 425 (1989);
52. G. Ecker et al., Nucl. Phys.B321, 311 (1989).
53. Particle Data Group, R. M. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. D54, 1 (1996).
54. B. Delcourt et al., Phys. Lett.99B, 257 (1981);
55. F. Manéet al., 99B, 261 (1981);
56. J. Buon et al., 118B, 221 (1982).
57. F. Felicetti and Y. Srivastava, Phys. Lett.107B, 227 (1981).
58. G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Lett.21, 244 (1968).
59. H. Georgi, Weak Interactions and Modern Particle Theory (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, 1984), Chaps. 5 and 6.
60. In the present context, we avoid making the heavy baryon expansion of the nonlinear chiral Lagrangian, even though such an expansion provides a well-defined truncation scheme for baryon CHPT with loops. For (Formula presented) scattering in the BA, however, the heavy baryon Lagrangian does not yield the correct pole structure.
61. Such suppression may not hold in the real world.
62. See, e.g., E. Hirsch et al., Phys. Lett.36B, 139 (1971);
63. E. Hirsch, U. Karshon, and H. J. Lipkin, 36B, 385 (1971).
64. R. E. Cutkosky, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)1, 429 (1960).
65. See, e.g., C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).