Instability of an “approximate black hole

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 55, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 6014-6018

  Choptuik, Matthew W ^a   Hirschmann, Eric W ^a   Liebling, Steven L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000116637     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6014     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. M. H. P. M. van Putten, Phys. Rev. D 54, R5931 (1996).
2. C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961).
3. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York, 1972).
4. In general, we have tried to follow van Putten’s notation fairly closely. However, we found the field (Formula presented) to be a useful quantity in the perturbation and use it instead of van Putten’s (Formula presented). Note too that at one point in his derivation van Putten uses (Formula presented), but for a quantity different from what we have defined above.
5. S. L. Liebling and M. W. Choptuik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1424 (1996).
6. What it means for a solution with a naked singularity at the origin to disperse is perhaps not well defined at the moment. However, the evolution clearly indicates that the energy content is moving toward large radius.
7. T. Hara, T. Koike, and S. Adachi, LANLReport No., 1996 (unpublished).
8. R. Bartnik and J. McKinnon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 141 (1988).
9. M. W. Choptuik, T. Chmaj, and P. Bizon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 424 (1996).
10. H. A. Buchdahl, Phys. Rev. 115, 1325 (1959).
11. M. Wyman, Phys. Rev. D 24, 839 (1981).
12. P. Jetzer and D. Scialom, Phys. Lett. A 169, 12 (1992).
13. A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 878 (1968).