Plaquette ground state in the two-dimensional SU(4) spin-orbital model

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 367-370

  Van Den Bossche, M ^a   Zhang, F C ^b   Mila, F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

11.30. j Symmetry and conservation laws; 75.10.Jm Quantized spin models; 75.40.Mg Numerical simulation studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000080433     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00011085     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. For a review of the standard Jahn-Teller decoupled spin-orbital systems, see K.I. Kugel', D.I. Khomskiǐ Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 136, 631 (1982); Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 231 (1982).
2. For a review of the standard Jahn-Teller decoupled spin-orbital systems, see K.I. Kugel', D.I. Khomskiǐ Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 136, 631 (1982); Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 231 (1982).
3. H.F. Pen, J. van den Brink, D.I. Khomskiǐ, G.A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1323 (1997).
4. L.F. Feiner, A.M. Oleś, J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2799 (1997).
5. G. Santoro, S. Sorella, L. Guidoni, A. Parola, E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3065 (1999).
6. Y. Kitaoka, T. Kobayashi, A. Kōda, H. Wakabayashi, Y. Niino, H. Yamakage, S. Taguchi, K. Amaya, K. Yamamura, M. Takano, A. Hirano, R. Kanno, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 67, 3703 (1998).
7. Y.Q. Li, M. Ma, D.N. Shi, F.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3527 (1998).
8. B. Sutherland, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3795 (1975).
9. Y.-Q. Li, M. Ma, D.-N. Shi, F.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 60, 12781 (1999).
10. Y. Yamashita, N. Shibata, K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 58, 9114 (1998).
11. S.K. Pati, R.R.P. Singh, D.I. Khomskiǐ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5406 (1998).
12. B. Frischmuth, F. Mila, M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 835 (1999).
13. F. Mila, B. Frischmuth, A. Deppeler, M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3697 (1999).
14. P. Azaria, A.O. Gogolin, P. Lecheminant, A.A. Nersesyan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 624 (1999).
15. J.F. Cornwall, Group Theory in Physics (Academic Press, London, 1984).
16. We have not included the 4-site cluster in this comparison because it has only one bond per site, whereas the 8 and 16 site clusters have two.
17. P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B 56, 2521 (1997); C. Waldtmann, H.-U. Everts, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, P. Lecheminant, L. Pierre, Eur. Phys. J. B 2, 501 (1998).
18. P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B 56, 2521 (1997); C. Waldtmann, H.-U. Everts, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, P. Sindzingre, P. Lecheminant, L. Pierre, Eur. Phys. J. B 2, 501 (1998).
19. F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2356 (1998).