Synthesis and Electronic Structure of Pentacyanoosmate(II) Complexes with N-Heterocyclic Ligands

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 21, 1996, Pages 6327-6333

  Slep, Leonardo D ^a   Baraldo, Luis M ^a   Olabe, José A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000076817     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic960377z     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Sharpe, A. G. The Chemistry of Cyano Complexes of the Transition Metals; Academic Press: New York, 1976; Chapter VII.
2. Macartney, D. H, Rev. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 9, 101.
3. Toma, H. E.; Malin, J. M. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 1039.
4. Toma, H. E.; Malin, J. M. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 2080.
5. Stochel, G.; Chatlas, J.; Martínez, P.; van Eldik, R. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 5480.
6. Haim, A. Comments Inorg. Chem. 1985, 4, 113 and references therein.
7. (a) Haim, A. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 273 and references therein.
8. (b) Burewicz, A.; Haim, A. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 1611.
9. Yeh, A.; Haim, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 369.
10. Olabe, J. A.; Haim, A. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 3278.
11. (e) Huang, H. Y.; Chen, W. J.; Yang, C. C.; Yeh, A. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 1862.
12. (f) Sasaki, Y.; Ninomiya, T.; Nagasawa, A.; Endo, K.; Saito, K. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 2164.
13. Creutz, C. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 1.
14. (a) Johnson, C. R.; Shepherd, R. E. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 1117.
15. (b) Johnson, C. R.; Shepherd, R. E. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 2439.
16. Olabe, J. A.; Gentil, L. A.; Rigotti, G. E.; Navaza, A. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 4297.
17. (a) Siddiqui, S.; Henderson, W. W.; Shepherd, R. E. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 3101.
18. (b) Henderson, W. W.; Shepherd, R. E. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2398.
19. (a) Hoddenbagh, J. M. A.; Macartney, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 380.
20. (b) Hoddenbagh, J. M. A.; Macartney, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 2099.
21. Hoddenbagh, J. M. A.; Macartney, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 245.
22. (a) Gentil, L. A.; Zerga, H. O.; Olabe, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1986, 2731.
23. (b) Olabe, J. A.; Zerga, H. O.; Gentil, L. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1987, 1267.
24. Almaraz, A. E.; Gentil, L. A.; Olabe, J. A. J. Chem Soc., Dalton Trans. 1989, 1973.
25. Chevalier, A. E.; Gentil, L. A.; Olabe, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1991, 1959.
26. (a) Gentil, L. A.; Navaza, A.; Olabe, J. A.; Rigotti, G. E. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1991, 179, 89.
27. (b) Forlano, P.; Baraldo, L. M.; Olabe, J. A.; Della Vedova. C. O. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 223, 37.
28. Macartney, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 3337.
29. Baraldo, L. M.; Bessega, M. S.; Rigotti, G. E.; Olabe, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 5890.
30. (a) Ford, P. C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1970, 5, 75.
31. (b) Taube, H. Surv. Prog. Chem. 1973, 6, 1.
32. Taube, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1979, 51, 901.
33. Taube, H. Comments Inorg. Chem. 1981, 1, 17.
34. (e) Lay, P. A.; Harman, W. D. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 37, 219.
35. Amalvy, J. I.; Varetti, E. L.; Aymonino, P. J.; Castellano, E. E.; Piro, O. E.; Punte, G. J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res. 1986, 16, 537.
36. Krause, R. A.; Violette, C. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1986, 113, 161.
37. Waldhoer, E.; Slep, L. D.; Olabe, J. A.; Kaim, W.; Fiedler, J. To be submitted.
38. Bahner, C. T.; Norton, L. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 2881.
39. Figard, J. E.; Paukstelis, J. V.; Petersen, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 8417.
40. Koelsch, C. P.; Gumprecht, H. J. Org. Chem. 1958, 23, 1603.
41. Szeczy, A. P.; Miller, S. S.: Haim, A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1978, 28, 189.
42. Toma, H. E.; Stadler, E. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 3085.
43. Morando, P. J.; Bruyere, V. I. E.; Blesa, M. A.; Olabe, J. A. Transition Met. Chem. 1983, 8, 99.
44. Slep, L. D.; Pollak, S.; Olabe, J. A. To be submitted.
45. Gutmann, V. The Donor-Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions; Plenum: New York, 1980.
46. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods; Wiley: New York, 1980.
47. Toma, H. E.; Creutz, C. Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 545
48. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 75th ed.; CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, 1994.
49. Mason, S. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1247.
50. Chia, A. S.; Trimble, R. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1961, 65, 863.
51. Moore, K. J.; Lee, L.; Mabbott, G. A.; Petersen, J. D. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 1108.
52. Parise, A. R.; Pollak, S.; Slep, L. D.; Olabe, J. A. An. Asoc. Quim. Argent. 1995, 83, 211.
53. Balzani, V.; Carassiti, V. Photochemistry of Coordination Compounds; Academic: New York, 1970.
54. Estrin, D. A.; Baraldo, L. M.; Slep, L. D.; Barja, B. C.; Olabe, J. A.; Paglieri, L.; Corongiu, G. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 3897.
55. Lever, A. B. P. Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.
56. +) seem to reflect the predominant increase in the energy of the π* level (due to back-bonding interactions) compared to the changes in the ground-state π level.
57. (a) Sen, J.; Taube, H. Acta Chem Scand., Ser. A 1979, A33, 125.
58. (b) Magnuson, R. H.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc: 1975, 97, 5129.
59. Lay, P. A.; Magnuson, R. H.; Taube, H. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 2848.
60. Toma, H. E.; Takasugi, M. S. J. Solution Chem. 1983, 12, 547.
61. Garcia Posse, M. E.; Katz, N. E.; Baraldo, L. M.; Polonuer, D. D.; Colombano, C. G.; Olabe, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 1830.
62. n- complexes.
63. Goodman, B. A.; Raynor, J. B. Adv. Inorg. Radiochem. 1970, 13, 192.
64. Kober, E. M.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 3967.
65. Curtis, J. C.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 3833.
66. Kober, E. M.; Goldsby, K. A.; Narayana, D. N. S.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 4303.
67. (a) Dodsworth, E.; Lever, A. B. P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 119, 61.
68. red values are related by a solvational energy term, which remains constant for the whole series and may be included in χ (cf. also ref 40).
69. Ernst, S. D.; Kaim, W. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1520.
70. Hilgers, F.; Brun, W.; Fiedler, J.; Kaim, W. J. Organomet. Chem., in press.
71. MLCT values for the ruthenium and osmium complexes, because of spin-orbit coupling effects. This was not the case for iron, as no band asymmetry was found, and thus the measured maximum energy corresponds to the unsplit case, i.e. the weighted average of the A and E states (see Figure 3). For osmium, however, the high-energy component (transition to the E state) must be diminished by 1/2λ in order to obtain an energy value free of spin-orbit effects. The same subtraction was performed for the ruthenium complex.
72. n- series are scarce in the literature (cf. ref 10). Our measurements for several L ligands show a trend similar to those found for iron and osmium complexes.
73. Crutchley, B. J.; Lever, A. B. P. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 2276.
74. act = 25 kcal/mol.
75. Williams, A. F. A Theoretical Approach to Inorganic Chemistry; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, New York, 1979; p 255.
76. III" character made available by the π-acid ability of cyanides. This is consistent with the relative solvatochromic changes of the MLCT bands, showing that Os is the strongest π-donor.