Seat Belt Attitudes, Habits, and Behaviors: An Adaptive Amendment to the Fishbein Model

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 1983, Pages 406-421

  And, John Wttenbraker ^a   Gibbs, Brenda Lynn ^a   Kahle, Lynn R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000075275     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb01748.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Attitude and behavior: a specification of the contingent consistency hypothesis
2. Self‐perception theory
3. Attitudes “cause” behaviors: a structural equation analysis
4. Does intelligence cause achievement? A cross‐lagged panel analysis
5. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
6. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology
7. Seat belts: factors influencing their use: a literature survey
8. A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications
9. Misconceptions about the Fishbein model: reflections on a study by Songer‐Nocks
10. The incidence and economic cost of cancer, motor vehicle injuries, coronary heart disease, and stroke: a comparative analysis
11. The value of safety belts: a review
12. Attitudes cause behaviors: a cross‐lagged panel analysis
13. A longitudinal study of adolescent attitude‐behavior consistency
14. Low adolescent self‐esteem leads to multiple interpersonal problems: a test of social adaptation theory
15. Cross‐lagged and synchronous common factors in panel data
16. Cross‐lagged panel correlation: a test for spuriousness
17. Cross‐lagged panel correlation: practice and promise
18. Attitudinal factors in the non‐use of seat belts
19. Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction
20. The place of habit in the control of action
21. Detecting causal priorities in panel study data
22. A study of restraint use and effectiveness
23. A critique of cross‐lagged correlation
24. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process
25. Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: a psychological perspective