Computer simulation of damage in diamond due to ion impact and its annealing

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 6650-6660

  Saada, David ^a   Adler, Joan ^a   Kalish, R ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000056624     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.6650     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. S. Prawer and R. Kalish, Phys. Rev. B 51, 15 711 (1995).
2. C. Uzan-Saguy, C. Cytermann, R. Brener, V. Richter, M. Shaanan, and R. Kalish, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1194 (1995).
3. A. Reznik, V. Richter, and R. Kalish, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7930 (1997).
4. H.C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).
5. D. C. Rapaport, The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
6. The visualization was carried out with a C program created on the basis of OpenGL libraries, permitting rotation and translation of a three-dimensional lattice. The only input was the coordinates of the atoms from the MD calculations. More information can be found at http://phycomp.technion.ac.il/publications.html
7. J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6991 (1988);
8. J. TersoffPhys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2879 (1988);
9. J. TersoffPhys. Rev. B 39, 5566 (1989). The parameters used here in the potential and with the notation of the latter reference, are as follows: (Formula presented) (Formula presented) μ=2.2119 (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented)
10. Alessandro De Vita, Guilia Galli, Andrew Canning, and Roberto Car, Nature (London) 379, 523 (1996);
11. Alessandro De VitaGuilia GalliAndrew CanningRoberto CarAppl. Surf. Sci. 104, 298 (1996).
12. S. Nose, Mol. Phys. 52, 255 (1984);
13. W. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).
14. D. Saada, J. Adler, and R. Kalish, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 9, 61 (1998).
15. Computations were carried out for the three major crystallographic axes and for directions spanning the angles between them (see Ref. 10 for more details). These compare well with results of previous MD calculations (Ref. 12) and with measurements (Ref. 13), the results of which are all in the range of 35 to 80 eV.
16. W. Wu and S. Fahy, Phys. Rev. B 49, 3030 (1994).
17. R. Kalish, in Properties and Growth of Diamond, edited by G. Davies (INSPEC, London, 1994), p. 193, and references therein.
18. We used a value of 0.04 for the ratio (Formula presented) between the time step and the thermal cooling time constant.
19. N. A. Marks, D. R. McKenzie, B. A. Pailthorpe, M. Bernasconi, and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 768 (1996).
20. N. A. Marks, D. R. McKenzie, B. A. Pailthorpe, M. Bernasconi, and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9703 (1996).
21. C. Z. Wang and K. M. Ho, Phys. Rev. B 50, 12 429 (1994).
22. N. A. Marks, Phys. Rev. B 56, 2441 (1997).
23. D. R. McKenzie, D. Muller, and B. A. Pailthorpe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 773 (1991).
24. P. J. Fallon, V. S. Veerasamy, C. A. Davis, J. Robertson, G. A. J. Amaratunga, W. I. Milne, and J. Koskinen, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4777 (1993).
25. Y. Lifshitz, G. D. Lempert, and E. Grossman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2753 (1994).
26. K. W. R. Gilkes, P. H. Gaskell, and J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12 303 (1995).