The ontogeny of sexual dimorphism: Quantitative models and a case study in labrisomid blennies (teleostei: Paraclinus)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 271-283

  Brooks, Meriel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000041031     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/40.3.271     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bookstein, F.L. 1989. "Size and shape": A comment on semantics. Syst. Zool. 38:173-180
2. Bookstein, F.L., B. Chernoff, R.L. Elder, J.M. Humphries, G.R. Smith, and R.E. Strauss. 1985. Morphometries in evolutionary biology. Spec. Publ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 15
3. Campbell, B. 1972. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago
4. Cheverud, J.M., and J.T. Richtsmeier. 1986. Finite- element scaling applied to sexual dimorphism in rhesus macaque (Macaco mulatto) facial growth. Syst. Zool. 35:381-399
5. Cock, A.G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 41:131-190
6. Cooper, W.E., and L.J. Vrrr. 1989. Sexual dimorphism of head and body size in an iguanid lizard: Paradoxical results. Am. Nat. 133:729-735
7. Darwin, C.R. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London. (Reprinted 1981, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.)
8. Fink, W.L. 1982. The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 8:254-264
9. Hubbs, C. 1952. A contribution to the classification of the blennioid fishes of the family Clinidae, with a partial revision of the eastern Pacific forms. Stanford Ichthyol. Bull. 4:41-165
10. Joucoeur, P. 1963. The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics 19:497-499
11. Leamy, L. and D. Bradley. 1982. Static and growth allometry of morphometric traits in randombred house mice. Evolution 36:1200-1212
12. Lindsey, C.C. 1975. Pleomerism, the widespread tendency among related fish species for vertebral number to be correlated with maximum body length. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32:2453-2469
13. Neter, J., and W. Wasserman. 1974. Applied linear statistical models. Richard Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois
14. Press, W.H., B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. 1986. Numerical recipes. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England
15. Rosenblatt, R. H., and T. D. Parr. 1969. The Pacific species of the clinid fish genus Paraclinus. Copeia 1969:1-20
16. Selander, R. K. 1966. Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113151
17. Shea, B. T. 1985. Bivariate and multivariate growth allometry: Statistical and biological considerations. J. Zool. (Lond.) 206:367-390
18. Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: A review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64:419-461
19. Slatkin, M. 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622-630
20. Springer, V. G. 1954. Western Atlantic fishes of the genus Paraclinus. Tex. J. Sci. 6:422-441
21. Stephens, J. S. 1963. A revised classification of the blennioid fishes of the American family Chae- nopsidae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 68:1-165
22. Strauss, R.E., and F.L. Bookstein. 1982. The truss: Body form reconstructions in morphometries. Syst. Zool. 31:113-135
23. Vial, J.L., and J.R. Stewart. 1988. The manifestation and significance of sexual dimorphism in anguid lizards: A case study of Barisia monticola. Can. J. Zool. 67:68-72
24. Vitt, L.J., and W.E. Cooper. 1985. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the skink Eumeces laticeps: An example of sexual selection. Can. J. Zool. 63: 995-1002