Wind tunnel study on wind speed reduction through successive synthetic windscreens

Journal of Agricultural and Engineering Research

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 117-123

  Dierickx, W ^a   Gabriels, D ^b   Cornelis, W M ^b  

^a Centrum voor Landbouwkundig Onderzoek Gent CLO / Centre de Recherches Agronomiques Gand   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000038269     PISSN: 00218634     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jaer.2000.0674     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bean A; Alperi R W; Federer C A (1975). A method for categorizing shelterbelt porosity. Agricultural Meteorology, 14, 417-429
2. Cornelis W (1994). A wind-tunnel study on the reduction coefficient of synthetic windscreens. MSc Dissertation. University of Ghent, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, International Center of Eremology
3. Dierickx W (1998). Flow reduction of synthetic screens obtained with both a water and air flow apparatus. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 71, 67-73, doi: 10.1006/jaer.1998.0299
4. Dierickx W (1999). Opening size determination of technical textiles used in agricultural applications. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 17(4), 231-245
5. Dierickx W; Gabriels D; Cornelis W (2001). A wind tunnel study on wind speed reduction of technical textiles used as windscreen. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 19(1), 59-73
6. Gandemer J (1979). Wind shelters. Journal of Industrial Aerodynamics, 4, 371-389
7. Gabriels D; Cornelis W; Pollet I; Van Coillie T; Quessar M (1997). The I.C.E. wind tunnel for wind and water erosion studies. Soil Technology, 10, 1-8
8. Heisler G M; Dewalle D R (1988). Effects of windbreak Structure on Wind Flow. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 22/23, 41-69
9. Jaubourg J (1988). Les filets brise-vents - Essais en cours [Synthetic windscreens - Current trials.] Centre National du Machinisme Agricole, du Génie Rural, des Eaux et des Forêts, (CEMAGREF), Bulletin Technique du Machinisme et des Équipements Agricoles, 29, 11-17
10. Jensen M (1954). Shelter effect: Investigations into the aerodynamics of shelter and its effects on climate and crops. The Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen
11. Kaiser H (1959). Die Stromung an Windschutzstreifen [The airflow through shelterbelts.] Berichte Deutscher Wetterdienstes, 7(53), 1-36
12. Nägeli W (1964). On the most favourable shelterbelt spacing. Scottish Forestry, 18, 4-15
13. Seginer I (1975). Flow around a windbreak in oblique wind. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 9, 133-141
14. Sturrock J W (1969). Aerodynamic studies of shelterbelts in New Zealand - 1: low to medium height shelterbelts in Mid Canterbury. New Zealand Journal of Science, 12, 754-776
15. Woodruff N P; Zingg A W (1955). A comparative analysis of wind-tunnel and atmospheric air-flow patterns about single and successive barriers. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 36(2), 203-208