Performance Assessment in Science

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1991, Pages 347-362

  Pine, Jerome ^b   Baxter, Gail P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000028823     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: 15324818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame0404_7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
2. Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93-104.
3. Guion, R. M. (1979). Principles of work sample testing: III. Construction and evaluation of work sample tests (TR-79-A10). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
4. Murnane, R. J., & Raizen, S. A. (Eds.). (1989). Improving indicators of the quality of science and mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Raizen, S. A., Baron, J. B., Champagne, A. B., Haertel, E., Mullis, I., & Oakes, J. (1989). Assessment in elementary school science education. Washington, DC: National Center for Improving Science Education.
6. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (in press). Tests as standards of achievement in schools. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O’Connor (Eds.), Future assessments: Changing views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Shavelson, R. J., & Baxter, G. P. (1990, September). The symmetry of teaching and testing: Zmplications for teachers’ instructional decisions. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Research on Effective and Responsible Teaching, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
9. Shavelson, R. J., & Baxter, G. P. (in press). Linking assessment with effective and responsible teaching: Implications for instructional decisions. In F. Oser, J. L. Patrie, A. Dick (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: A new synthesis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., Pine, J., Yurè, J., Goldman, S. R., Smith, B. (1991). Alternative technologies for large scale science assessment: Instrument of education reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 97-114.
11. Shavelson, R. J., Carey, N. B., & Webb, N. M. (1990). Indicators of science achievement: Options for a powerful policy instrument. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 692-697.
12. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932.
13. Wigdor, A. K., & Green, B. F. (1986). Assessing the performance of enlisted personnel: Evaluation of a joint-service research project. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.