-
3
-
-
0030974493
-
-
(b) Zhu, G.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Xiao, D.; Cao, P.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3836.
-
(1997)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.119
, pp. 3836
-
-
Zhu, G.1
Chen, Z.2
Jiang, Q.3
Xiao, D.4
Cao, P.5
Zhang, X.6
-
5
-
-
85044492129
-
-
(d) Shu, L. H.; Sun, W. Q.; Zhang, D. W.; Wu, S. H.; Xu, J. F.; Lao, X. F. Chem. Commun. 1997, 79.
-
(1997)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 79
-
-
Shu, L.H.1
Sun, W.Q.2
Zhang, D.W.3
Wu, S.H.4
Xu, J.F.5
Lao, X.F.6
-
7
-
-
85045587338
-
-
(f) O'Donovan, B. F.; Hitchcock, P..B.; Meidine, M. F.; Kroto, H. W.; Taylor, R.; Walton, D. R. M. Chem. Commun. 1997, 81.
-
(1997)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 81
-
-
O'Donovan, B.F.1
Hitchcock, P.B.2
Meidine, M.F.3
Kroto, H.W.4
Taylor, R.5
Walton, D.R.M.6
-
10
-
-
0346888810
-
-
and references therein
-
(a) Houk, K. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 361 and references therein.
-
(1975)
Acc. Chem. Res.
, vol.8
, pp. 361
-
-
Houk, K.N.1
-
15
-
-
0000646951
-
-
(b) Dunn, L. C.; Chang, Y. M.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7095.
-
(1976)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.98
, pp. 7095
-
-
Dunn, L.C.1
Chang, Y.M.2
Houk, K.N.3
-
19
-
-
37049099407
-
-
(b) Bonadew, M.; DeMicheli, C.; Gandolfi, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 939.
-
(1977)
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
, pp. 939
-
-
Bonadew, M.1
DeMicheli, C.2
Gandolfi, R.3
-
20
-
-
0005897970
-
-
(c) Mukherjee, D.; Watts, C. R.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 817.
-
(1978)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.43
, pp. 817
-
-
Mukherjee, D.1
Watts, C.R.2
Houk, K.N.3
-
21
-
-
0002455919
-
-
(d) DeMicheli, C.; Gandolfi, R.; Gruenanger, P. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 3765.
-
(1974)
Tetrahedron
, vol.30
, pp. 3765
-
-
DeMicheli, C.1
Gandolfi, R.2
Gruenanger, P.3
-
23
-
-
33845377269
-
-
(b) Hayakawa, K.; Nishiyama, H.; Kanematsu, K. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 80, 512
-
(1985)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.80
, pp. 512
-
-
Hayakawa, K.1
Nishiyama, H.2
Kanematsu, K.3
-
26
-
-
85037499058
-
-
note
-
3.8b
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
85037509094
-
-
note
-
In the case of 8 the electronic influence of the 2-methyl group was anticipated to retard both the formation of A and the cyclization step (E → F, Scheme 3) by diminishing the electrophilicity of the central allenic carbon. Consequently, the reaction in the case of 8 occurred only at elevated temperatures. Also, as anticipated, the dipole derived from allenic ester 8 did not yield any (6 + 4) cycloadduct.
-
-
-
|