Sex differences in the links between attractiveness, self-esteem and the body

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1047-1056

  Wade, T Joel ^a   Cooper, Marjorie ^a  

^a BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beauty; Body self relations; Body image; Evolutionary theory; Self esteem; Sex differences

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000023395     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00043-4     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abelson R.P., Kinder D.R., Peters M.D., Fiske S.T. Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 42:1982;619-630.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. 1980;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Alexander R.D. Darwinism and human affairs. 1979;University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
4. Aronson E., Wilson T.D., Akert R.M. Social psychology: the heart and the mind. 1994;Harper Collins, New York.
5. Barkow J.H. Social norms, the self and sociobiology: building on the ideas of A.I. Hallowell. Current Anthropology. 19:(1):1978;99-103.
6. BarTal D., Saxe L. Perceptions of similarly and dissimilarly attractive couples and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 33:1976;772-781.
7. Bem D.J. Self-perception theory. Berkowitz L. Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 6:1972;1-62 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
8. Berscheid E., Walster E. Interpersonal attraction. 2nd ed :1978;Random House, New York.
9. Björntorp P. The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease. Acta Medica Scandavica (Suppl.). 723:1988;121-134.
10. Björntorp P. Fat cell distribution and metabolism. Wurtman R.J. Human obesity. 1987;66-72 New York Academy of Sciences, New York.
11. Breckler E.C. Empirical validation of affect, behavior and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 47:1984;1191-1205.
12. Breckler S.J., Wiggins E.C. Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 27:1989;180-200.
13. Buss D.M. The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54:(4):1988;616-628.
14. Buss D.M., Dedden L.A. Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 7:1990;395-422.
15. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: a contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review. 100:1993;204-232.
16. Cash, T. (1990). The MBSRQ. Unpublished test manual. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University (available upon request from the author).
17. Cooley C.H. Human order and the social order. 1902;Scribners, New York.
18. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16:1951;297-334.
19. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. 1993;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.
20. Eagly A., Mladinic A., Otto S. Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 30:1994;113-137.
21. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. 1975;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
22. Franzoi S.L. Social psychology. 1995;Brown & Benchmark, Chicago, IL.
23. Gangestad S.W., Thornhill R., Yeo R.A. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology. 15:1994;73-85.
24. Granberg D., Brown T.A. On affect and cognition in politics. Social Psychology Quarterly. 52:1989;171-182.
25. Henss R. Waist to hip ratio and attractiveness. replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences. 19:(4):1995;479-488.
26. Katz D. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly. 24:1960;163-204.
27. Kuykendall D., Keating J.P. Altering thoughts and judgments through repeated association. British Journal of Social Psychology. 29:1990;79-86.
28. McGuire W.J. Attitudes and attitude change. Lindzey G., Aronson E. Handbook of social psychology. Vol. 2:1985;233-346 Random House, New York.
29. Mead G.H. Mind, self and society. 1934;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
30. Pliner P., Chaiken S., Flett G. Gender differences in concern with body weight and physical appearance over the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 16:1990;263-273.
31. Rosenberg M. Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. Suls J., Greenwald A.G. Psychological perspectives on self. 1986;107-136 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
32. Rosenberg M. Society and adolescent self-image. 1965;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
33. Shavitt S. The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 26:1990;124-148.
34. Shavitt S. Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., Greenwald A.G. Attitude structure and function. 1989;311-337 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
35. Sigall H., Landy D. Radiating beauty: effect of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 28:1973;218-224.
36. Singh D. Female health, attractiveness and desirability for relationship: role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology. 16:1995;465-481.
37. Singh D. Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 69:(6):1995;1089-1101.
38. Singh D. Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences. 16:(1):1994;123-132.
39. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65:(2):1993;293-307.
40. Singh D., Luis S. Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women's attractiveness. Human Nature. 6:1995;51-65.
41. Singh D., Young R.K. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology. 16:1995;483-507.
42. Smith M.B., Bruner J.S., White R.W. Opinions and personality. 1956;Wiley, New York.
43. Symons D. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. Abramson P.R., Pinkerton S.D. Sexual nature/sexual culture. 1995;80-118 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
44. Tashakkori A., Thompson V. Gender, self-perception and self-devaluation in depression: a factor analytic study among Iranian college students. Personality and Individual Differences. 10:1989;341-354.
45. Trivers R. Parental investment and sexual selection. Campbell B. Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971. 1972;136-179 Aldine, Chicago.
46. Videbeck R. Self conception and the reaction of others. Sociometry. 23:1960;351-359.
47. Wade, T. J. (in press). Evolutionary theory and self-perception: sex differences in body esteem predictors of self-perceived physical and sexual attractiveness and self-esteem. International Journal of Psychology.
48. Wade T.J., Abetz H. Social cognition and evolutionary psychology: physical attractiveness and contrast effects on women's self-perceived body image. International Journal of Psychology. 32:(1):1997;35-42.
49. Wade, T.J., and McCrea, S. (1996). Evolutionary theory and contrast effects on men's self-ratings of attractiveness and social dominance: status, physical fitness, or looks. Paper presented at the 67th Eastern Psychological Association Convention, Philadelphia, PA, March 29-31.
50. Wade T.J., Thompson V., Tashakkori A., Valente E. A longitudinal analysis of sex by race differences in predictors of adolescent self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences. 10:(7):1989;717-729.
51. Wiggins J.S., Wiggins N., Conger J.C. Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 10:1968;82-90.
52. Zajonc R.B. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist. 35:1980;151-175.
53. Zanna M.P., Rempel J.K. Attitudes: a new look at an old concept. BarTal D., Kruglanski A.W. The social psychology of knowledge. 1988;315-334 Cambridge University press, Cambridge, England.