Are the Big Five Rasch scalable? A reanalysis of the NEO-FFI norm data;Sind die Big Five Rasch-skalierbar? Eine Reanalyse der NEO-FFI-Normierungsdaten

Diagnostica

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 119-127

  Rost, Jürgen ^a   Carstensen, Claus H ^a   Von Davier, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mixed Rasch model; Personality assessment; Rasch model; Response sets

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000019550     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.3.119     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allport, G. W. & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, Whole No. 211.
2. Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 1, 123-140.
3. Andrich, D. (1995). Hyperbolic cosine latent trait models for unfolding direct responses and pairwise preferences. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 3, 269-290.
4. Bem, D. & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross situational consistency in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506-520.
5. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1991). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung fünf robuster Persönlichkeitsfaktoren. Diagnostica, 37, 29-41.
6. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae. Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
7. Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventoty. Manual form S and form R. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Davier v., M. (1996). Methoden zur Prüfung probabilistischer Testmodelle (IPN-Schriftenreihe). Kiel: IPN.
9. Dayton, C. M. & Macready, G. B. (1980). A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents. Psychometrika. 45, 3, 343-356.
10. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of factorial structures of per-sonality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 319-344.
11. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1987). Valididation of the fivefactor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
12. Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren Modells der Persönlichkeit. Regensburg: Roderer.
13. Reise, S. P. (in press). Application of IRT in Personality and Attitude Assessment. In S. Embretson & S.P. Reise (Eds.), Psychometric methods: Item response theory for psychologists. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Roskam, E. E. (1995). Graded responses and joining categories: A rejoinder to Andrich's "Models for measurement, precision, and nondichotomization of graded responses". Psychometrika, 60, 1, 27-35.
15. Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271-282.
16. Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 75-92.
17. Rost, J. (1996). Lehrbuch Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion. Bern: Huber.
18. Rost, J. & Davier v., M. (1995). Mixture distribution Rasch models. In G. Fischer & I. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundation, recent developments, and applications (pp. 257-268). Berlin: Springer.
19. Rost, J. & Georg, W. (1991). Alternative Skalierungsmöglichkeiten zur klassischen Testtheorie am Beispiel der Skala "Jugendzentrismus". Zentral-Archiv-Information, 28, 52-74.
20. Rost, J. & Luo, G. (1997). An application of a Rasch-based unfolding model to a questionnaire on adolescent centrism. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 278-286). Münster: Waxmann.
21. Verhelst, N. D. & Glas, C. A. W. (1995). The one parameter logistic model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models -foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 215-238). New York:. Springer.