-
13
-
-
0001472865
-
-
E. Sorensen, I. Affleck, D. Augier, and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. B58, R14 701 (1998).
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.58
, pp. 14
-
-
Sorensen, E.1
Affleck, I.2
Augier, D.3
Poilblanc, D.4
-
18
-
-
85038952091
-
-
X. Wang, cond-mat/9803290 (unpublished).
-
-
-
Wang, X.1
-
19
-
-
85038902499
-
-
(private communication)
-
H.Q. Lin, cond-mat/9805269 (unpublished);and (private communication).
-
-
-
Lin, H.Q.1
-
21
-
-
4244065420
-
-
V.N. Kotov, O. Sushkov, Z. Weihong, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5790 (1998).
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.80
, pp. 5790
-
-
Kotov, V.N.1
Sushkov, O.2
Weihong, Z.3
Oitmaa, J.4
-
24
-
-
85038938249
-
-
Equation (30) can also be derived as a two-particle Schrödinger equation in momentum space (Formula presented) For the singlet bound state one has (Formula presented) where (Formula presented) are defined in the text before Eq. (28). For a triplet bound state with polarization (Formula presented) While this way of deriving the Bethe-Salpeter equation is quite simple and physically transparent, the approach presented in the text is more general and we give it preference since it is better suited for treating more complicated interaction terms [e.g., three-body interactions which appear in certain models with dimerization (Ref. 17
-
Equation (30) can also be derived as a two-particle Schrödinger equation in momentum space (Formula presented) For the singlet bound state one has (Formula presented) where (Formula presented) are defined in the text before Eq. (28). For a triplet bound state with polarization (Formula presented) While this way of deriving the Bethe-Salpeter equation is quite simple and physically transparent, the approach presented in the text is more general and we give it preference since it is better suited for treating more complicated interaction terms [e.g., three-body interactions which appear in certain models with dimerization (Ref. 17)].
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
85038908520
-
-
Strictly speaking Eq. (40) is valid for (Formula presented) However it works quite well even for (Formula presented) For example at the point (Formula presented) according to Eq. (40) (Formula presented) while the numerical result (Refs. 6 and 13) is (Formula presented)
-
Strictly speaking Eq. (40) is valid for (Formula presented) However it works quite well even for (Formula presented) For example at the point (Formula presented) according to Eq. (40) (Formula presented) while the numerical result (Refs. 6 and 13) is (Formula presented)
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
85038934954
-
-
This effect is similar to the shift of energy levels due to radiative corrections in relativistic atomic physics (Lamb shift)
-
This effect is similar to the shift of energy levels due to radiative corrections in relativistic atomic physics (Lamb shift).
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
85038908381
-
-
Phys. Rev. BY. Xian, 52, 12 485 (1995).
-
(1995)
, vol.52
, pp. 12
-
-
Xian, Y.1
|