On modelling variable structure dynamics of hybrid parameter multiple body systems

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 209, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 571-592

  Barhorst, A A ^a  

^a Texas Tech University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000013145     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1277     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. K. W. LIPS and R. P. SINGH 1988 Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 587-594. Obstacles to high fidelity multibody dynamics simulation.
2. P. W. LIKINS 1988 Proceedings of the Workshop on Multibody Simulation, 10-24, JPL D-5190. Multibody dynamics: a historical perspective.
3. J. C. SIMO 1988 Proceedings of the Workshop on Multibody Simulation, 235-296, JPL D-5190. Nonlinear dynamics of flexible structures, a geometrically exact approach.
4. L. MEIROVITCH 1988 Proceedings of the IUTAM/IFAC Symposium on Dynamics of Controlled Mechanical Systems, 37-48. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. State equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasi-coordinates.
5. K. H. LOW and M. VIDYASAGAR 1988 Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 110, 175-181. A Lagrangian formulation of the dynamic model for flexible manipulator systems.
6. L. PETZOLD 1982 SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 3, 367-384. Differential/algebraic equations are not ode's.
7. E. J. HAUG and J. YEN 1989 Proceedings of Advances in Design Automation, 117-123, ASME. Implicit numerical integration of constrained equations of motion via generalized coordinate partitioning.
8. S. K. IDER and F. M. L. AMIROUCHE 1989 Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 111, 238-243. On the constraint violations in the dynamic simulations of multibody systems.
9. S. P. TIMOSHENKO and J. N. GOODIER 1970 Theory of Elasticity. New York: McGraw-Hill; third edition.
10. S. C. WU and E. J. HAUG 1986 Proceedings of Advances in Design Automation, (New York), 389-399, ASME. A substructure technique for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems with contact-impact.
11. M. G. NASSER 1992 PhD Thesis, The University of Houston, Houston, TX. Numerical methods for multibody elastic systems and contact.
12. W. J. STRONGE 1994 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61, 605-611. Swerve during three-dimensional impact of rough bodies.
13. N. N. KISHORE, A. GHOSH, S. K. RATHORE and P. V. KISHORE 1994 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61, 643-611. Finite element analysis of quasi-static problems using minimum dissipation of the energy principle.
14. J. K. PARK and B. M. KWAK 1994 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61, 703-709. Three-dimensional frictional contact analysis using the homotopy method.
15. T. A. LAURSEN and V. G. OANCEA 1994 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61, 956-963. Automation and assessment of augmented Lagrangian algorithms for frictional contact problems.
16. C.-S. YEN and E. WU 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 692-705. On the inverse problem of rectangular plates subjected to elastic impact, Parts I and II.
17. D. B. MARGHITU and Y. HURMUZLU 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 725-731. Three-dimensional rigid-body collisions with multiple contact points.
18. V. BHATT and J. KOECHLING 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 740-746. Partitioning the parameter space according to different behaviors during three-dimensional impacts.
19. B. WANG, T. X. YU and S. R. REID 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 887-892. Out-of-plane impact at the tip of a right-angled bent cantilever beam.
20. V. BHATT and J. KOECHLING 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 893-898. Three-dimensional frictional rigid-body impact.
21. J. A. BATTLE 1996 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 63, 168-172. Rough balanced collisions.
22. P. VILLAGGIO 1996 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 63, 259-263. The rebound of an elastic sphere against a rigid wall.
23. D. STOIANOVICI and Y. HURMUZLU 1996 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 63, 307-316. A critical study of the applicability of rigid-body collision theory.
24. J. W. GIBBS 1961 The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs, Volume II: Dynamics, Etc. New York: Dover.
25. J. I. NEIMARK and N. A. FUFAEV 1972 Dynamics of Non-Holonomic Systems. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. Translated from Russian by J. R. Barbour.
26. T. R. KANE and D. A. LEVINSON 1985 Dynamics Theory and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. L. J. EVERETT and M. J. MCDERMOTT 1986 Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 108, 141-145. The use of vector techniques in variational problems.
28. E. A. DESLOGE 1987 Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics 10, 120-122. Relationship between Kane's equations and the Gibbs-Appell equations.
29. F. E. UDWADIA and R. E. KALABA 1992 Proceedings of The Royal Society, London, Series A 439, 407-410. A new perspective on constrained motion.
30. H. ESSEN 1994 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61, 689-694. See discussion in Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 552-553. On the geometry of nonholonomic dynamics.
31. J. G. PAPASTAVRIDIS 1994 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61, 453-459. On the Boltzmann Hamel equations of motion: a vectorial treatment.
32. D. L. MINGORI 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 505-510. Lagrange's equations, Hamilton's equations, and Kane's equations: interrelations, energy integrals, and a variational principle.
33. J. G. PAPASTAVRIDIS 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 924-929. On the transformation properties of the nonlinear Hamel equations.
34. A. A. BARHORST 1995 ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 62, 243-245. An alternative derivation of some new perspectives on constrained motion.
35. A. A. BARHORST and L. J. EVERETT 1995 The International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics 30, 1-21. Modeling hybrid parameter multiple body systems: a different approach.
36. A. A. BARHORST and L. J. EVERETT 1995 Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 117, 559-569. Contact/impact in hybrid parameter multiple body systems.
37. A. A. BARHORST 1997 Journal of Sound and Vibration 208, 823-839. Symbolic equation processing utilizing vector/dyad notation.